ArticleBiomicrofluidics2024
Microfluidics enabled multi-omics triple-shot mass spectrometry for cell-based therapies.
Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comprehensive Review on the Toxicity of Five Main AQ Constituents from Rhubarb: Mechanisms, Challenges and Future Perspectives.Drug design, development and therapy · 2026Review
- Evaluating inkjet dispenser/liquid vortex capture-mass spectrometry for single-cell metabolomics in Hep G2 steatosis caused by tamoxifen.Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
In recent years, cell-based therapies have transformed medical treatment. These therapies present a multitude of challenges associated with identifying the mechanism of action, developing accurate safety and potency assays, and achieving low-cost product manufacturing at scale. The complexity of the problem can be attributed to the intricate composition of the therapeutic products: living cells with complex biochemical compositions. Identifying and measuring critical quality attributes (CQAs) that impact therapy success is crucial for both the therapy development and its manufacturing. Unfortunately, current analytical methods and tools for identifying and measuring CQAs are limited in both scope and speed. This Perspective explores the potential for microfluidic-enabled mass spectrometry (MS) systems to comprehensively characterize CQAs for cell-based therapies, focusing on secretome, intracellular metabolome, and surfaceome biomarkers. Powerful microfluidic sampling and processing platforms have been recently presented for the secretome and intracellular metabolome, which could be implemented with MS for fast, locally sampled screening of the cell culture. However, surfaceome analysis remains limited by the lack of rapid isolation and enrichment methods. Developing innovative microfluidic approaches for surface marker analysis and integrating them with secretome and metabolome measurements using a common analytical platform hold the promise of enhancing our understanding of CQAs across all "omes," potentially revolutionizing cell-based therapy development and manufacturing for improved efficacy and patient accessibility.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.