ArticlePlastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open2024
Bilateral Forehead Rotation Flap with Skin Substitute Application for Convexity Replacement.
Article in Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- The evolving landscape of eyebrow reconstruction: from traditional flaps to minimally invasive techniques and regenerative medicine.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Large forehead defects pose reconstructive challenges, considering the tissue inelasticity and the need to preserve symmetry of the eyebrow and hairline. Local skin flaps and primary closures are mainstays of forehead reconstruction with many techniques reported, but they may not cover the entire defect. Further closure options with acceptable cosmesis are limited. While providing a functional alternative, skin grafting may take on an atrophic concavity and shiny texture. Free flaps similarly may not accurately replicate the contour of the forehead and may be discordant with the texture of adjacent skin. We describe a reproducible technique for closing a large central forehead defect in a single-stage local flap while retaining symmetry of eyebrows and neurovascular integrity. We also propose serially applying a skin substitute to the remaining portion of the defect to recreate forehead convexity and potentially expedite healing. This technique may represent a viable and reproducible method for recreating the natural contour of the forehead when complete closure may not be an option.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.