Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268712›Full record

ArticleAWWA water science2023

Nitrogen-sparging assisted anoxic biological drinking water treatment system.

Asher E Keithley, Peyton Woodruff, Daniel J Williams, Nicholas R Dugan, Darren A Lytle

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in AWWA water science, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Asher E KeithleyU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-3510-8690
Peyton WoodruffOak Ridge Institute for Science and Education (ORISE) intern at U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Daniel J WilliamsU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.
Nicholas R DuganU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-4513-5198
Darren A LytleU.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research & Development, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5282-4541
Environmental Protection Agency · US

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Existing heterotrophic denitrification reactors rely on microorganisms to consume dissolved oxygen (DO) and create conditions suitable for denitrification, but this practice leads to excessive microbial growth and increased organic carbon doses. An innovative reactor that uses nitrogen gas sparging through a contactor to strip DO was developed and tested in the lab. It reduced influent nitrate from 15 to <1 mg/L as N with nitrite accumulation <1 mg/L as N. It maintained a consistent flow rate and developed minimal headloss, making it easier to operate than the denitrifying dual-media filter that was operated in parallel. Gravel, polyvinyl chloride pieces, and no packing media were assessed as options for the nitrogen-sparged contactor, and gravel was found to support denitrification at the highest loading rate and was resilient to nitrogen-sparging shutoffs and intermittent operation. This innovative reactor appears promising for small drinking water systems.

Indexed as

biological treatmentdenitrificationgroundwaternitrate

Identifiers

PMID38268712
PMCPMC10805249
OpenAlexW4387753816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.