Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268708›Full record

ReviewJournal of parasitology research2024

A Review of Ethnomedicinal Plants as Potential Anthelmintic Agents to Alternatively Control Gastrointestinal Nematodes of Ruminants in South Africa.

Lindokuhle Christopher Mhlongo, Cresswell Mseleku, Thando Tenza, Sylvester Werekeh Fomum, Lyndy Joy McGaw, Abubeker Hassen, Ignatius Verla Nsahlai

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of parasitology research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Combined ethanolic extracts ofVeterinary world · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Journal of advanced veterinary and animal research · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Lindokuhle Christopher MhlongoDepartment of Animal Science, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4315-3889
Cresswell MselekuDepartment of Animal and Poultry Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8298-3842
Thando TenzaDepartment of Animal and Poultry Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8121-2643
Sylvester Werekeh FomumDepartment of Animal and Poultry Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6198-7687
Lyndy Joy McGawDepartment of Paraclinical Sciences, University of Pretoria, Onderstepoort, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8447-0613
Abubeker HassenDepartment of Animal and Wildlife Sciences, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8240-3414
Ignatius Verla NsahlaiDepartment of Animal and Poultry Science, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Pietermaritzburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8645-2080
University of KwaZulu-Natal · ZAOnderstepoort Veterinary Academic Hospital · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZAUniversity of the Free State · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small ruminant production is one of the most important animal productions for food security in the world, especially in the developing world. Gastrointestinal nematode (GIN) infection is a threat to this animal's production. Conventional drugs that are used to control these parasites are losing their efficacy due to the development of resistant parasites. These drugs are not biologically degradable, taint meat products and are also expensive for communal farmers. Hence, research is now exploring ethnomedicinal anthelmintic plants for an alternative remedy. The objective of this paper was to review ethnomedicinal plants as a potential alternative to unsustainable commercial anthelmintics. This review sought to understand common GINs infecting ruminants, resistance manifestation in GINs to conventional treatment, reasons communal farmers choose ethnomedicine, and modes of action in anthelmintic plants. It also examined the usage of plants and plant parts, dosage forms, methods for improving bioactivity, convectional validation procedures, and restrictions on ethnomedicinal plant use as anthelmintics in ethnomedicine. Such insight is essential, as it highlights the importance of ethnoveterinary medicine and ways to adopt or improve it as a potential alternative to conventional anthelmintics.

Identifiers

PMID38268708
PMCPMC10805549
OpenAlexW4390901319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.