Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268615›Full record

ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024

Cervical cancer screening among female health workers: Evidence from a secondary health facility in Northern Malawi.

Atusaye Mwalwanda, Elton Chavura, Master R O Chisale, Balwani Chingatichifwe Mbakaya

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Atusaye MwalwandaUniversity of Livingstonia, Department of Public Health, Malawi.
Elton ChavuraMzuzu University, Faculty of Environmental Science, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Master R O ChisaleMzuzu University, Faculty of Science Technology and Innovations, Biological Sciences, Mzuzu, Malawi.
Balwani Chingatichifwe MbakayaUniversity of Livingstonia, Department of Public Health, Malawi.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cervical cancer is preventable and curable if identified early. Although health workers have a critical role in influencing beliefs and practices of the entire population, some studies have shown paradoxical efforts among female health workers themselves-a threat towards attainment of the triple-intervention strategy as propagated by the World Health Organization (WHO). The study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices of cervical cancer screening among female health workers. The study used a descriptive cross-sectional design. Data entry and analysis were carried out using IBM Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) version 20.0 (SPSS, Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA). The response rate was 65.4 % and mean age of 32 years with standard deviation=±8.397. The majority of participants were nurses n = 31 (43.3). There was poor knowledge on signs/symptoms and risk factors as only 15.7 % were aware of multiple sexual partners, 7.1 % for each early sexual encounter and uncircumcised men as risk factors. Regarding willingness, 77.1 % were willing to have the screening test. Their practices were rated poor as only 35.7 % (n = 25) had ever undergone screening within the past 6 years. There was poor knowledge, fair attitudes and poor practices of cervical cancer screening among female health workers. As part of the efforts to achieve sustainable development goal (SDG) target 3.4 and the attainment of WHO 90-70-90 target by 2030; this study recommends scaling up health education, social mobilization and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations to support awareness, detection and treatment of cervical cancer. Acceptability of the current screening methods must be further explored.

Indexed as

AttitudeCervical cancerFemale health workersKnowledgePracticesScreening

Identifiers

PMID38268615
PMCPMC10805659

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.