ArticlePreventive medicine reports2024
Cervical cancer screening among female health workers: Evidence from a secondary health facility in Northern Malawi.
Article in Preventive medicine reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Preventive insights and practices of female health professionals regarding cervical cell dysplasia: a cross-sectional study in Egypt.BMC public health · 2025Article
- Article
- Knowledge, attitudes, and barriers to cervical cancer screening utilization among female healthcare professionals in the Tamale Metropolis.Women's health (London, England)Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cervical cancer is preventable and curable if identified early. Although health workers have a critical role in influencing beliefs and practices of the entire population, some studies have shown paradoxical efforts among female health workers themselves-a threat towards attainment of the triple-intervention strategy as propagated by the World Health Organization (WHO). The study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes and practices of cervical cancer screening among female health workers. The study used a descriptive cross-sectional design. Data entry and analysis were carried out using IBM Statistical Package for Social Scientists (SPSS) version 20.0 (SPSS, Michigan Avenue, Chicago, IL, USA). The response rate was 65.4 % and mean age of 32 years with standard deviation=±8.397. The majority of participants were nurses n = 31 (43.3). There was poor knowledge on signs/symptoms and risk factors as only 15.7 % were aware of multiple sexual partners, 7.1 % for each early sexual encounter and uncircumcised men as risk factors. Regarding willingness, 77.1 % were willing to have the screening test. Their practices were rated poor as only 35.7 % (n = 25) had ever undergone screening within the past 6 years. There was poor knowledge, fair attitudes and poor practices of cervical cancer screening among female health workers. As part of the efforts to achieve sustainable development goal (SDG) target 3.4 and the attainment of WHO 90-70-90 target by 2030; this study recommends scaling up health education, social mobilization and Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccinations to support awareness, detection and treatment of cervical cancer. Acceptability of the current screening methods must be further explored.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.