Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268525›Full record

ArticleBMJ open sport & exercise medicine2024

Effectiveness of an On-Field Rehabilitation framework for return to sports in injured male professional football players: a single-blinded, prospective, randomised controlled trial.

Ioannis Stathas, Alkiviadis Kalliakmanis, Afxentios Kekelekis, Despoina Danassi Afentaki, Elias Tsepis, Konstantinos Fousekis

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open sport & exercise medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05163470 (Effectiveness of a New On Field Rehabilitation Framework for Return to Sport in Injured Elite Football Players - a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05163470 naunknown statusnot on this map

Effectiveness of a New On Field Rehabilitation Framework for Return to Sport in Injured Elite Football Players - a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of PatrasRan2021 to 2022Enrolled125ConditionsSport InjuryArmsearly on filed functional rehabilitation, traditional on filed functional rehabilitation
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Injection therapy in professional footballers.International orthopaedics · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ioannis StathasPhysiotherapy Department, School of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Patras, Patra, Greece.ORCID 0000-0002-9222-0910
Alkiviadis KalliakmanisDeputy Director of B' Orthopedic Department, Henry Dunant Hospital Center, Athens, Greece.
Afxentios KekelekisLaboratory of Neuromechanics, School of Physical Education and Sport Science at Serres, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Thessaloniki, Greece.
Despoina Danassi AfentakiDiagnostic Radiologist, Iatropolis, Athens, Greece.
Elias TsepisPhysiotherapy Dept School of Health Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Patras, Patra, Greece.
Konstantinos FousekisPhysiotherapy Department Therapeutic exercise and Sports Rehabilitation exercise laboratory, University of Patras, Patra, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: In football, on-field rehabilitation (OFR) is critical during injury recovery for a player's safe return to sports (RTS). The study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of an OFR framework for RTS in injured male professional football players. Trial design: A prospective block-randomised controlled-parallel trial was conducted (level of evidence 1b). Methods: Male professional football players (mean age, 26.3±3.6 years) from Greece diagnosed with an acute, lower limb musculoskeletal (MSK) injury (confirmed clinically and through imaging) participated in the study. During rehabilitation, the participants' OFR was guided by either the On-Field Rehabilitation (On FI.RE.) accelerated framework (experimental group) or a traditional OFR framework for a late injury recovery phase (comparison group). Between July 2021 and January 2022, 76 players were randomly allocated to the experimental group (n=38) and the comparison group (n=38). Participants were blinded during the study regarding intervention therapeutic protocols. The primary outcome measure was the effect of On FI.RE. framework on the time needed to return to team training (RTT) participation. The correlation between the time needed to return to on-field activity and RTT was calculated. Subsequent injuries were registered for a 12-month follow-up period. Results: The intervention protocol, On FI.RE. framework, had a statistically significant effect on the time needed to RTT (F(1) = 49 626, p<0.001) with a large effect size (ES; η Conclusion: The On FI.RE., an accelerated OFR framework during injury recovery, is more effective than a traditional OFR framework, reducing the time a player needs to RTS. It entails a very low risk of reinjury. Trial registration number: NCT05163470.

Indexed as

FootballSportSporting injuriesSports rehabilitation programs

Identifiers

PMID38268525
PMCPMC10806762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.