Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268521›Full record

ArticleResearch and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis2024

von Willebrand factor Ristocetin co-factor activity to von Willebrand factor antigen level ratio for diagnosis of acquired von Willebrand syndrome caused by aortic stenosis.

Noriyuki Okubo, Shingo Sugawara, Tohru Fujiwara, Ko Sakatsume, Tsuyoshi Doman, Mihoko Yamashita, Kota Goto, Masaki Tateishi, Misako Suzuki, Ryutaro Shirakawa and 27 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Bleeding in valvular heart disease: is von Willebrand factor the culprit?Research and practice in thrombosis and haemostasis · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

37 authors at 12 institutions in 1 country.

Noriyuki OkuboDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Shingo SugawaraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Tohru FujiwaraDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Ko SakatsumeDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Tsuyoshi DomanDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Mihoko YamashitaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Kota GotoDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Masaki TateishiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Misako SuzukiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Ryutaro ShirakawaDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yuka EuraDepartment of Molecular Pathogenesis, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Koichi KokameDepartment of Molecular Pathogenesis, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Masaki HayakawaDepartment of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Masanori MatsumotoDepartment of Blood Transfusion Medicine, Nara Medical University, Kashihara, Japan.
Yasunori KawateMedical Affairs 2, Medical & Scientific Affairs, Sysmex Corporation, Kobe, Japan.
Mizuki MiuraDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura-kitaku, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Hiroshi TakiguchiDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura-kitaku, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Yoshimitsu SogaDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura-kitaku, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Shinichi ShiraiDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura-kitaku, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Kenji AndoDepartment of Cardiology, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura-kitaku, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Yoshio AraiDepartment of Cardiovascular Surgery, Kokura Memorial Hospital, Kokura-kitaku, Kitakyushu, Japan.
Takaharu NakayoshiDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Yoshihiro FukumotoDivision of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan.
Hiroyuki TakahamaCardiovascular Department, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Satoshi YasudaCardiovascular Department, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Japan.
Toshihiro TamuraDepartment of Cardiology, Tenri Hospital, Tenri, Japan.
Shin WatanabeDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Takeshi KimuraDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan.
Nobuhiro YaoitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Hiroaki ShimokawaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Yoshikatsu SaikiDivision of Cardiovascular Surgery, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Koichi KaikitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Center for Metabolic Regulation of Healthy Aging, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Kenichi TsujitaDepartment of Cardiovascular Medicine, Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Center for Metabolic Regulation of Healthy Aging, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan.
Shinji YoshiiDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Hiroshi NakaseDepartment of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Sapporo Medical University School of Medicine, Sapporo, Japan.
Shin-Ichi FujimakiDepartment of Clinical Laboratory Medicine, Tohoku University Hospital, Sendai, Japan.
Hisanori HoriuchiDepartment of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute of Development, Aging and Cancer, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
University of Miyazaki · JPTohoku University · JPKokura Memorial Hospital · JPKurume University · JPKumamoto University · JPKyoto University · JPNara Medical University · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JPSapporo Medical University · JPSysmex (Japan) · JPTenri Hospital · JPTohoku University Hospital · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Severe aortic stenosis (AS) causes acquired von Willebrand syndrome by the excessive shear stress-dependent cleavage of high molecular weight multimers of von Willebrand factor (VWF). While the current standard diagnostic method is so-called VWF multimer analysis that is western blotting under nonreducing conditions, it remains unclear whether a ratio of VWF Ristocetin co-factor activity (VWF:RCo) to VWF antigen levels (VWF:Ag) of <0.7, which can be measured with an automated coagulation analyzer in clinical laboratories and is used for the diagnosis of hereditary von Willebrand disease. Objectives: To evaluated whether the VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag is useful for the diagnosis of AS-induced acquired von Willebrand syndrome. Methods: VWF:RCo and VWF:Ag were evaluated with the VWF large multimer index as a reference, which represents the percentage of a patient's VWF high molecular weight multimer ratio to that of standard plasma in the VWF multimer analysis. Results: We analyzed 382 patients with AS having transaortic valve maximal pressure gradients of >30 mmHg, 27 patients with peripheral artery disease, and 46 control patients free of cardiovascular disease with osteoarthritis, diabetes, and so on. We assumed a large multimer index of <80% as loss of VWF large multimers since 59.0% of patients with severe AS had the indices of <80%, while no control patients or patients with peripheral artery disease, except for 2 patients, exhibited the indices of <80%. The VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios, measured using an automated blood coagulation analyzer, were correlated with the indices (r Conclusion: VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios of <0.7 may indicate loss of VWF large multimers with high specificity, but low sensitivity. VWF:RCo/VWF:Ag ratios in patients with AS having a ratio of <0.7 may be useful for monitoring the loss of VWF large multimers during their clinical courses.

Indexed as

acquired von Willebrand syndromeaortic stenosisvon Willebrand factorVWF:RCo/VWF:AgVWF Ristocetin co-factor activity

Identifiers

PMID38268521
PMCPMC10805667
OpenAlexW4389210604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.