ArticleInterdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery2024
Clinical evaluation of the impact of mediastinal tumour size on the subxiphoid approach video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery.
Article in Interdisciplinary cardiovascular and thoracic surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Technical nuances and early outcomes of uniportal subxiphoid video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for anterior mediastinal tumor resection without artificial pneumothorax: a retrospective analysis.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Modified subxiphoid uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery with percutaneous suspension technique via balance hook sternal elevation device in anterior mediastinal masses.World journal of surgical oncology · 2026Article
- Effect of surgical management for anterior mediastinal large mass: a retrospective cohort study.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Interpretable machine learning model predicts postoperative complications after thoracoscopic mediastinal tumor surgery: a multicenter study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the difficulty of video-assisted thoracoscopic anterior mediastinal tumor resection via the subxiphoid approach.Journal of thoracic disease · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesThe application of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) for relatively large mediastinal tumours (≥5.0 cm) has been a subject of debate, and few studies have investigated the subxiphoid approach VATS in different tumour size categories. The study aims to compare the efficacy of the subxiphoid approach VATS for achieving curative outcomes based on tumour size categories (<3.0, 3.0-4.9 and 5.0-10.0 cm).
methodsA total of 165 patients with anterior mediastinal tumours who underwent surgery at our hospital between January 2018 and July 2022 were consecutively enrolled, categorized according to tumour size-group A (<3.0 cm): 58, group B (3.0-4.9 cm): 70 and group C (5.0-10.0 cm): 37. Clinical baseline data, intraoperative and postoperative outcomes, and postoperative complications were analysed.
resultsThe study revealed significant differences in operation time among the 3 groups (group A: 103.4 ± 36.1, group B: 106.4 ± 35.2, group C: 127.4 ± 44.8; P < 0.05) as well as in the volume of drainage (group A: 273.3 ± 162.0, group B: 411.9 ± 342.6, group C: 509.7 ± 543.7; P < 0.05). However, no differences were seen in blood loss, drainage duration, postoperative hospital stay and duration of postoperative oral analgesics. Additionally, the incidence of postoperative complications did not exhibit significant differences across these groups.
conclusionsSubxiphoid approach VATS is considered a feasible and safe surgical method for large-sized anterior mediastinal tumours (5.0-10.0 cm) with no invasion to the surrounding tissues and organs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.