Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268475›Full record

ArticleThe British journal of radiology2024

Radiomics-clinical nomogram for preoperative lymph node metastasis prediction in esophageal carcinoma.

Xiaotao Geng, Yaping Zhang, Yang Li, Yuanyuan Cai, Jie Liu, Tianxiang Geng, Xiangdi Meng, Furong Hao

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Xiaotao GengShandong University Cancer Center, Shandong University, 440 Jiyan Road, Jinan, 250117, China.
Yaping ZhangDepartment of Radiology, Weifang People's Hospital, 151 Guangwen Street, Weifang, 261000, China.
Yang LiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weifang People's Hospital, 151 Guangwen Street, Weifang, 261000, China.
Yuanyuan CaiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weifang People's Hospital, 151 Guangwen Street, Weifang, 261000, China.
Jie LiuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weifang People's Hospital, 151 Guangwen Street, Weifang, 261000, China.
Tianxiang GengDepartment of Biomaterials, Faculty of Dentistry, University of Oslo, Oslo, 0455, Norway.
Xiangdi MengDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weifang People's Hospital, 151 Guangwen Street, Weifang, 261000, China.
Furong HaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Weifang People's Hospital, 151 Guangwen Street, Weifang, 261000, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5402-0109
Weifang People's Hospital · CNShandong University · CNUniversity of Oslo · NO

Funding

Science and Technology Development Project of Weifang City 2020YX008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThis research aimed to develop a radiomics-clinical nomogram based on enhanced thin-section CT radiomics and clinical features for the purpose of predicting the presence or absence of metastasis in lymph nodes among patients with resectable esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC).

methodsThis study examined the data of 256 patients with ESCC, including 140 cases with lymph node metastasis. Clinical information was gathered for each case, and radiomics features were derived from thin-section contrast-enhanced CT with the help of a 3D slicer. To validate risk factors that are independent of the clinical and radiomics models, least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression analysis was used. A nomogram pattern was constructed based on the radiomics features and clinical characteristics. The receiver operating characteristic curve and Brier Score were used to evaluate the model's discriminatory ability, the calibration plot to evaluate the model's calibration, and the decision curve analysis to evaluate the model's clinical utility. The confusion matrix was used to evaluate the applicability of the model. To evaluate the efficacy of the model, 1000 rounds of 5-fold cross-validation were conducted.

resultsThe clinical model identified esophageal wall thickness and clinical T (cT) stage as independent risk factors, whereas the radiomics pattern was built based on 4 radiomics features chosen at random. Area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.684 and 0.701 are observed for the radiomics approach and clinical model, respectively. The AUC of nomogram combining radiomics and clinical features was 0.711. The calibration plot showed good agreement between the incidence of lymph node metastasis predicted by the nomogram and the actual probability of occurrence. The nomogram model displayed acceptable levels of performance. After 1000 rounds of 5-fold cross-validation, the AUC and Brier score had median values of 0.702 (IQR: 0.65, 7.49) and 0.21 (IQR: 0.20, 0.23), respectively. High-risk patients (risk point >110) were found to have an increased risk of lymph node metastasis [odds ratio (OR) = 5.15, 95% CI, 2.95-8.99] based on the risk categorization.

conclusionA successful preoperative prediction performance for metastasis to the lymph nodes among patients with ESCC was demonstrated by the nomogram that incorporated CT radiomics, wall thickness, and cT stage. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study demonstrates a novel radiomics-clinical nomogram for lymph node metastasis prediction in ESCC, which helps physicians determine lymph node status preoperatively.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophageal Squamous Cell CarcinomaHumansLymphatic MetastasisNomogramsRadiomicsRetrospective Studiescomputed tomographyesophageal cancerlymph node metastasisradiomics

Identifiers

PMID38268475
PMCPMC11027331
OpenAlexW4391228902

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.