Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268298›Full record

ReviewNursing open2024

Insights from defining nurses' career success: An integrative review.

Masako Yamada, Kyoko Asakura, Shoko Sugiyama, Nozomu Takada

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Masako YamadaGraduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-6504-2266
Kyoko AsakuraGraduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Shoko SugiyamaGraduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.
Nozomu TakadaGraduate School of Medicine, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0795-1426
Tohoku University · JP

Funding

JST, the establishment of university fellowships towards the creation of science technology innovation JPMJFS2102
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo review the literature and identify factors that make sense of and influence nurses' career success. We sought to provide insights into achieving nurses' career success.

designAn integrative review conducted in May 2022 using Whittemore and Knafl's methodology of integrative review.

methodsThe databases searched were PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and CINAHL. Search criteria included the keywords "nurs*" and "career success" in the title and abstract. The quality of the reviewed papers was assessed using the JBI Critical Appraisal Tool for cross-sectional studies and qualitative research. We extracted five types of information from quantitative studies: the definition of career success, factors of career success instruments, reliability or validity of career success instruments, and factors influencing nursing career success. Furthermore, we extracted two types of information from qualitative studies: themes that imply career success and factors that influence nurses' career success. Primary data were categorized into two perspectives: (1) what nurses' career success means and (2) what influences nurses' career success. Categorized data were unified into similar contents. Themes were developed from unified subgroups.

resultsFourteen studies were included in the analysis. Seven themes were integrated into the factors that make sense of nurses' career success: satisfaction, positive attitude towards work, quality work in nursing, continuation of career and professional development, positive interaction at work, person-organization fit, and enrichment of an individual's life. Three themes were integrated into the factors influencing nursing career success: personal resources, positive behavior toward nursing work and research, and job resources and environment. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: Patients or members of the public were not involved in this review.

Indexed as

NursesCross-Sectional StudiesDatabases, FactualHumansReproducibility of Resultscareercareer successintegrative reviewnursesnursing

Identifiers

PMID38268298
PMCPMC10697118
OpenAlexW4389202072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.