Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268296›Full record

ArticleNursing open2024

Nurses' experiences and perspectives regarding evidence-based practice implementation in healthcare context: A qualitative study.

Rasha A Mohamed, Muhanad Alhujaily, Faransa A Ahmed, Wael G Nouh, Abeer A Almowafy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Rasha A MohamedDepartment of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Muhanad AlhujailyDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Faransa A AhmedDepartment of Nursing, College of Applied Medical Sciences in Alnamas, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Wael G NouhDepartment of Medical Laboratory Sciences, College of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Bisha, Bisha, Saudi Arabia.
Abeer A AlmowafyInternational Islamic Center for Population Studies and Research, Al-Azhar University, Cairo, Egypt.ORCID 0000-0002-6445-5034

Funding

University of Bisha UB-GRP- 19 -1444
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo explore nurses' experiences and perspectives about evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation in the healthcare context.

designA qualitative descriptive study design using focus group discussions (FGDs).

methodSixty-four nurses who purposefully selected and worked at various healthcare organizations in Bisha Governorate, Saudi Arabia, were included. Eight FGDs were used to obtain data using open-ended questions. The collected data underwent inductive qualitative content analysis.

resultsTwo main categories were extracted: experiences and perspectives towards EBP. The experiences category emerged into four sub-categories: familiarity with concepts and benefits, steps, dissemination sources of EBP and sources of EBP knowledge, while perspectives towards the EBP category included four sub-categories: application of EBP in clinical practice, barriers, facilitators and EBP application methods. The participants experienced being in a non-supportive and non-encouraging atmosphere which results from a lack of organizational commitment to EBP implementation and illuminates the complexities involved in the integration process.

conclusionThe nurses' experience with EBP indicated that there was limited support for the implementation of this approach. Furthermore, they experienced varying barriers to EBP implementation. They viewed EBP as a complex technique as they lacked knowledge and skills related to the formulation of research questions, and retrieving, applying and disseminating of EBP in clinical practice decision-making. That is due to barriers pertinent to the individual, organizational and patient factors. The key to successfully implementing an EBP in nursing practice is to promote professional development, comprehensive and continuous training, a culture of change, organizational support and motivation. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Through the construction and provision of ongoing educational interventions and mentoring programmes about EBP, healthcare organizations and nursing leadership may develop a comprehensive strategy to encourage staff nurses' participation in the EBP process. This is to enhance nurses' experiences and perspectives towards the EBP approach and overcome the barriers to effective implementation. NO PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION TO THIS STUDY: Patients or the general public were not involved in the design, analysis or interpretation of the data in this study.

Indexed as

AtmosphereClinical Decision-MakingEvidence-Based PracticeFocus GroupsHumansQualitative Researchclinical practiceevidence-based practiceexperienceshealthcareimplementationnursesperspectives

Identifiers

PMID38268296
PMCPMC10790056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.