ArticleNursing open2024
Self-management theories, models and frameworks in patients with chronic heart failure: A scoping review.
Article in Nursing open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Generic instruments for assessing self-management abilities and behaviors in patients with chronic diseases: a COnsensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement INstruments (COSMIN)-based systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2026Pooled it
- Latent Profile Analysis of Autologous Arteriovenous Fistula Self-Management in Patients Undergoing Maintenance Hemodialysis.Patient preference and adherence · 2026Article
- Article
- Health Literacy and Self-Care in Patients with Chronic Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Developing and Validating of the Family Coping Scale for Patients with Chronic Heart Failure.Psychology research and behavior management · 2024Article
- Self-management theories, models and frameworks in patients with chronic heart failure: A scoping review.Nursing open · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimThe aim of this study was to synthesize the self-management theory, model and frameworks of patients with chronic heart failure, focusing on construction process, methods and existing problems.
backgroundAlthough the self-management theories have been created and verified for those patients with chronic heart failure, no reviews have been performed to integrate these theories.
designA scoping review of recent literature (without a date limit) was conducted.
methodsA comprehensive literature search was performed. If the study reported the construction of a self-management theory, model or framework about chronic heart failure cases, it would be included in the review.
resultsFourteen studies were included, which could be categorized into situation-specific theory, middle-range theory and other theory models (including conceptual model, hypothetic regression model and identity description model). It also includes the update and validation of theories, the situation-specific theoretical of caregiver contributions extended from situation-specific theories and the nurse-led situation-specific theory in different contexts.
conclusionSelf-management might contribute to start an education programme before patients with chronic heart failure (CHF) begin their chronic disease live as an individual. Our scoping review indicates that a series of self-management theories, models and frameworks for CHF patients have been developed, but more studies are still needed to validate and support these theories according to their cultural contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.