SynthesisSystematic reviews2024
Clinical prediction models for the early diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea in stroke patients: a systematic review.
Synthesis in Systematic reviews, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.
- Revolutionizing Sleep Medicine: The Impact of Machine Learning on Diagnosis, Treatment, and Personalized Care.Health science reports · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Based Multidimensional Oximetry for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Screening: Development and External Validation.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Clinical Indicators and Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Associated with Moderate-to-Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea in Patients with Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Single-Center Retrospective Study.Nature and science of sleep · 2026Article
- Age and Witnessed Apneas as Independent Predictors of Obstructive Sleep Apnea After Stroke: A Prospective Cohort Study.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Exploring the potential biomarkers between stroke and obstructive sleep apnea by WGCNA and machine learning.Sleep & breathing = Schlaf & Atmung · 2025Article
- A Risk Correlative Model for Sleep Disorders in Chinese Older Adults Based on Blood Micronutrient Levels: A Matched Case-Control Study.Nutrients · 2024Article
- OSApredictor: A tool for prediction of moderate to severe obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea using readily available patient characteristics.Computers in biology and medicine · 2024Article
- Artificial intelligence in respiratory care.Frontiers in digital health · 2024Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Sleep Medicine: The Dawn of a New Era.Nature and science of sleep · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundObstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common sleep disorder characterized by repetitive cessation or reduction in airflow during sleep. Stroke patients have a higher risk of OSA, which can worsen their cognitive and functional disabilities, prolong their hospitalization, and increase their mortality rates.
methodsWe conducted a comprehensive literature search in the databases of PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library, and CNKI, using a combination of keywords and MeSH words in both English and Chinese. Studies published up to March 1, 2022, which reported the development and/or validation of clinical prediction models for OSA diagnosis in stroke patients.
resultsWe identified 11 studies that met our inclusion criteria. Most of the studies used logistic regression models and machine learning approaches to predict the incidence of OSA in stroke patients. The most frequently selected predictors included body mass index, sex, neck circumference, snoring, and blood pressure. However, the predictive performance of these models ranged from poor to moderate, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve varying from 0.55 to 0.82. All the studies have a high overall risk of bias, mainly due to the small sample size and lack of external validation.
conclusionAlthough clinical prediction models have shown the potential for diagnosing OSA in stroke patients, their limited accuracy and high risk of bias restrict their implications. Future studies should focus on developing advanced algorithms that incorporate more predictors from larger and representative samples and externally validating their performance to enhance their clinical applicability and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.