Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268003›Full record

ReviewBMC health services research2024

A collaboratively produced model of service design for children and young people with common mental health problems.

Steven Pryjmachuk, Susan Kirk, Claire Fraser, Nicola Evans, Rhiannon Lane, Jodie Crooks, Rose McGowan, Georgia Naughton, Liz Neill, Elizabeth Camacho and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BMC health services research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Steven PryjmachukSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK. steven.pryjmachuk@manchester.ac.uk.
Susan KirkSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Claire FraserSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Nicola EvansSchool of Healthcare Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Rhiannon LaneSchool of Healthcare Studies, Cardiff University, Cardiff, UK.
Jodie CrooksThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Rose McGowanThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Georgia NaughtonThe McPin Foundation, London, UK.
Liz NeillCommon Room North, Leeds, UK.
Elizabeth CamachoUniversity of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
Peter BowerSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Penny BeeSchool of Health Sciences, The University of Manchester and Manchester Academic Health Science Centre (MAHSC), Jean McFarlane Building, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK.
Tim McDougallLancashire and South Cumbria NHS Foundation Trust, Preston, UK.

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research HS&DR 17/09/08
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLittle is known about the effectiveness of, and implementation complexities associated with, service delivery models for children and young people (CYP) experiencing 'common' mental health problems such as anxiety, depression, behavioural difficulties and self-harm. This paper outlines how a model for high-quality service design for this population group was developed by identifying available services, their effectiveness, cost-effectiveness and acceptability, and the barriers and enablers to access.

methodsSequential, mixed-methods design, combining evidence syntheses (scoping and integrative reviews of the international literature) with primary research (a collective case study in England and Wales). Data from these two elements were collaboratively synthesised in a subsequent model-building phase.

resultsThe scoping review yielded a service model typology. The integrative review found effectiveness evidence only for four models: collaborative care (the only service model to also have cost-effectiveness evidence), outreach approaches, brief intervention services and an organisational framework called 'Availability, Responsiveness and Continuity'. No service model seemed more acceptable than others. Three case study themes were identified: pathways to support; service engagement; and learning and understanding. The model-building phase identified rapid access, learning self-care skills, individualised support, clear information, compassionate and competent staff and aftercare planning as core characteristics of high-quality services. These characteristics were underpinned by four organisational qualities: values that respect confidentiality; engagement and involvement; collaborative relationships; and a learning culture.

conclusionsA consistent organisational evidence-base for service design and delivery in CYP's mental health spanning many years appears to have had little impact on service provision in England and Wales. Rather than impose - often inflexible and untested - specific local or national models or frameworks, those commissioning, designing and delivering mental health services for CYP should (re)focus on already known, fundamental components necessary for high-quality services. These fundamental components have been integrated into a collaboratively produced general model of service design for CYP with common mental health problems. While this general model is primarily focused on British service provision, it is broad enough to have utility for international audiences.

Indexed as

AnxietyMental HealthAdolescentAnxiety DisordersChildData AccuracyEnglandHumansChildrenEvidence synthesisMental health servicesOrganisational case studiesService deliveryService designYoung people

Identifiers

PMID38268003
PMCPMC10809440

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.