Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38268000›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2024

Quartet metabolite reference materials for inter-laboratory proficiency test and data integration of metabolomics profiling.

Naixin Zhang, Qiaochu Chen, Peipei Zhang, Kejun Zhou, Yaqing Liu, Haiyan Wang, Shumeng Duan, Yongming Xie, Wenxiang Yu, Ziqing Kong and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Naixin Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Qiaochu Chen *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Peipei Zhang *State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Kejun ZhouHuman Metabolomics Institute, Inc., Shenzhen, Guangdong, China.
Yaqing LiuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Haiyan WangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Shumeng DuanState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Yongming XieShanghai Applied Protein Technology Co. Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Wenxiang YuNovogene Bioinformatics Institute, Beijing, China.
Ziqing KongCalibra Diagnostics, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Luyao RenState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Wanwan HouState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jingcheng YangState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoyun GongNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China.
Lianhua DongNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China.
Xiang FangNational Institute of Metrology, Beijing, China.
Leming ShiState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Ying YuState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. ying_yu@fudan.edu.cn.
Yuanting ZhengState Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering, School of Life Sciences and Human Phenome Institute, Shanghai Cancer Center, Fudan University, Shanghai, China. zhengyuanting@fudan.edu.cn.ORCID 0000-0003-4480-8303

Funding

111 Project B13016National Key R&D Project of China 2018YFE0201603National Key R&D Project of China 2022FY101203National Key R&D Project of China 2022YFF0608404National Natural Science Foundation of China 31720103909National Natural Science Foundation of China 32170657Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Major Project 2017SHZDZX01State Key Laboratory of Genetic Engineering SKLGE-2117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVarious laboratory-developed metabolomic methods lead to big challenges in inter-laboratory comparability and effective integration of diverse datasets.

resultsAs part of the Quartet Project, we establish a publicly available suite of four metabolite reference materials derived from B lymphoblastoid cell lines from a family of parents and monozygotic twin daughters. We generate comprehensive LC-MS-based metabolomic data from the Quartet reference materials using targeted and untargeted strategies in different laboratories. The Quartet multi-sample-based signal-to-noise ratio enables objective assessment of the reliability of intra-batch and cross-batch metabolomics profiling in detecting intrinsic biological differences among the four groups of samples. Significant variations in the reliability of the metabolomics profiling are identified across laboratories. Importantly, ratio-based metabolomics profiling, by scaling the absolute values of a study sample relative to those of a common reference sample, enables cross-laboratory quantitative data integration. Thus, we construct the ratio-based high-confidence reference datasets between two reference samples, providing "ground truth" for inter-laboratory accuracy assessment, which enables objective evaluation of quantitative metabolomics profiling using various instruments and protocols.

conclusionsOur study provides the community with rich resources and best practices for inter-laboratory proficiency tests and data integration, ensuring reliability of large-scale and longitudinal metabolomic studies.

Indexed as

Liquid Chromatography-Mass SpectrometryMetabolomicsCell LineHumansReproducibility of ResultsTwins, MonozygoticLC–MSMetabolomicsQuality controlReference materialSignal-to-noise ratio (SNR)Standardization

Identifiers

PMID38268000
PMCPMC10809448

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.