Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267901›Full record

SynthesisBMC cancer2024

An update of clinical value of circulating tumor DNA in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Yaozhong Zhang, Huazhen Du, Na Wang, Lei Wang, Yajie Huang

Open access · goldAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC cancer, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yaozhong ZhangDepartment of Infectious diseases, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Huazhen DuDepartment of Emergency, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Na WangDepartment of Molecular Biology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Lei WangDepartment of Thoracic Surgery, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China.
Yajie HuangDepartment of Medical oncology, the Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang, China. 1005733408@qq.com.
Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University · CNHebei Medical University · CN

Funding

Hebei Provincial Health Commission 20240093Hebei Provincial Health Commission 20240798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEsophageal cancer (EC) is a deadly disease with limited therapeutic options. Although circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) could be a promising tool in this regard, the availiable evidence is limited. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the clinical applicability of the next-generation sequencing (NGS) and droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) technology on the ctDNA detection of the EC and listed the current challenges.

methodsWe systematically searched MEDLINE (via PubMed), Embase (via OVID), ISI Web of Science database and Cochrane Library from January, 2000 to April, 2023. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were set as primary outcome endpoints. Pathologic response was evaluated by tumor regression grade (TRG), according to the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC). Major pathologic regression (MPR) was defined as TRG 1 and 2. The MPR was set as secondary endpoint. Hazard rate (HR) and associated 95% CI were used as the effect indicators the association between ctDNA and prognosis of EC. MPR rates were also calculated. Fixed-effect model (Inverse Variance) or random-effect model (Mantel-Haenszel method) was performed depending on the statistically heterogeneity.

resultsTwenty-two studies, containing 1144 patients with EC, were included in this meta-analysis. The results showed that OS (HR = 3.87; 95% CI, 2.86-5.23) and PFS (HR = 4.28; 95% CI, 3.34-5.48) were shorter in ctDNA-positive patients. In the neoadjuvant therapy, the sensitivity analysis showed the clarified HR of ctDNA-positive was 1.13(95% CI, 1.01-1.28). We also found that TP53, NOTCH1, CCND1 and CNKN2A are the most frequent mutation genes.

conclusionsPositive ctDNA is associated with poor prognosis, which demonstrated clinical value of ctDNA. Longitudinal ctDNA monitoring showed potential prognostic value in the neoadjuvant therapy. In an era of precision medicine, ctDNA could be a promising tool to individualize treatment planning and to improve outcomes in EC. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42023412465.

Indexed as

Circulating Tumor DNAEsophageal NeoplasmsDatabases, FactualGene LibraryGenes, cdcHumansCirculating Tumor DNACirculating tumor DNA (ctDNA)Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR)Esophageal cancer (EC)Meta-analysisNext-generation sequencing (NGS)

Identifiers

PMID38267901
PMCPMC10809487
OpenAlexW4391160703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.