Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267894›Full record

ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2024

3D printing assisted MIPO for treatment of complex middle-proximal humeral shaft fractures.

Chaoran Hu, Bing Qiu, Chaode Cen, Qin Luo, Yongfei Cao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. 3D Bioprinting in Limb Salvage Surgery.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2024
    Review
  8. Are the costs of 3D printing for surgical procedures yet to be definitively assessed?Journal of orthopaedics and traumatology : official journal of the Italian Society of Orthopaedics and Traumatology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Chaoran HuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang, 550014, Guizhou, China.
Bing QiuDepartment of Orthopedics, The Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang, 550014, Guizhou, China.
Chaode CenDepartment of Orthopedics, The Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang, 550014, Guizhou, China.
Qin LuoDepartment of Orthopedics, The Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang, 550014, Guizhou, China.
Yongfei CaoDepartment of Orthopedics, The Beijing Jishuitan Hospital Guizhou Hospital, Guiyang, 550014, Guizhou, China. ayouvs@vip.qq.com.

Funding

Guizhou Provincial Health Commission Foundation of China gzwkj2021-265Guizhou Provincial Health Commission Foundation of China gzwkj2022-364Guizhou Science and Technology Foundation, Science and Technology Plan Project No. ZK [2021] General item 389
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study was designed to explore the clinical efficacy of 3-dimensional (3D) printing assisted minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) technique by comparing the clinical outcomes with traditional open reduction and internal plating fixation (ORIF) for treating complex middle-proximal humerus fractures (AO 12C fracture type). MATERIALS AND

methodsThe data of 42 participants who received a complicated middle-proximal humerus fracture from the beginning of 2018 to the end of 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients were assigned to two groups: MIPO with detailed preoperative planning assisted by 3D printing technique (MIPO group), and traditional ORIF (ORIF group).

resultsThis study included 21 patients in the ORIF group and 21 patients in the MIPO group. All patients were followed-up for at least one year (mean: 16.12 ± 4.13 months), and no difference was observed in the range of shoulder joint motion (ROM), Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (QuickDASH) scores and Constant scores between the two groups. However, the occurrence of complications (surgical incision site infection, implant loosening, bone nonunion and radial nerve palsy) in ORIF group was remarkably higher compared to the MIPO group. All the cases achieved bone union within the MIPO group. Significant differences were found in surgical time, intraoperative blood loss and fracture healing time between the two groups.

conclusionPreoperative 3D printing assisted MIPO technique exhibits obvious advantages in high operational efficiency and low occurrence of complications, which is worthy of clinical application for treating complex middle-proximal humeral shaft fractures.

Indexed as

Blood Loss, SurgicalShoulder FracturesBone PlatesHumansHumerusPrinting, Three-DimensionalRetrospective Studies3D printingMiddle-proximal humerus fractureMinimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesisOpen reduction and internal plating fixationPreoperative simulation

Identifiers

PMID38267894
PMCPMC10809673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.