Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267856›Full record

ArticleBMC genomics2024

High-fidelity (repeat) consensus sequences from short reads using combined read clustering and assembly.

Ludwig Mann, Kristin Balasch, Nicola Schmidt, Tony Heitkam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ludwig MannFaculty of Biology, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01069, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8756-8106
Kristin BalaschFaculty of Biology, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01069, Dresden, Germany.
Nicola SchmidtFaculty of Biology, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01069, Dresden, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0038-9581
Tony HeitkamFaculty of Biology, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01069, Dresden, Germany. tony.heitkam@tu-dresden.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0168-8428

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 031B1221ADeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 433081887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite the many cheap and fast ways to generate genomic data, good and exact genome assembly is still a problem, with especially the repeats being vastly underrepresented and often misassembled. As short reads in low coverage are already sufficient to represent the repeat landscape of any given genome, many read cluster algorithms were brought forward that provide repeat identification and classification. But how can trustworthy, reliable and representative repeat consensuses be derived from unassembled genomes?

resultsHere, we combine methods from repeat identification and genome assembly to derive these robust consensuses. We test several use cases, such as (1) consensus building from clustered short reads of non-model genomes, (2) from genome-wide amplification setups, and (3) specific repeat-centred questions, such as the linked vs. unlinked arrangement of ribosomal genes. In all our use cases, the derived consensuses are robust and representative. To evaluate overall performance, we compare our high-fidelity repeat consensuses to RepeatExplorer2-derived contigs and check, if they represent real transposable elements as found in long reads. Our results demonstrate that it is possible to generate useful, reliable and trustworthy consensuses from short reads by a combination from read cluster and genome assembly methods in an automatable way.

conclusionWe anticipate that our workflow opens the way towards more efficient and less manual repeat characterization and annotation, benefitting all genome studies, but especially those of non-model organisms.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDNA Transposable ElementsCluster AnalysisConsensus SequenceGenomicsDNA Transposable ElementsConsensus sequenceseccDNANon-model organismsrDNARepeat assemblyRepeat clusteringRepetitive DNARibosomal DNATransposable elements

Identifiers

PMID38267856
PMCPMC10809544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.