Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267801›Full record

Observational studyInfection2024

Clinical presentation and antimicrobial resistance of invasive Escherichia coli disease in hospitalized older adults: a prospective multinational observational study.

Joachim Doua, Jesús Rodríguez-Baño, Rachel Froget, Padma Puranam, Oscar Go, Jeroen Geurtsen, Sanne van Rooij, Tuba Vilken, Inage Minoru, Izumi Yasumori and 10 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Infection, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04117113 (Prospective Epidemiological Study to Estimate the O-serotype Distribution of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia Coli), which is not on this map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04117113 completednot on this map

Prospective Epidemiological Study to Estimate the O-serotype Distribution of Extraintestinal Pathogenic Escherichia Coli (ExPEC) Isolated From Hospitalized Patients Aged 60 Years or Older With Invasive ExPEC Disease (IED) and to Evaluate the Clinical Case Definition and Risk Factors.

TypeobservationalSponsorUMC UtrechtRan2019 to 2021Enrolled238ConditionsE. Coli Infection
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Joachim DouaJanssen Research and Development, Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
Jesús Rodríguez-BañoUnidad Clínica de Enfermedades Infecciosas y Microbiología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Seville, Spain.
Rachel FrogetInserm Clinical Investigation Center 1435, Dupuytren University Hospital, Limoges, France.
Padma PuranamHealth Sciences North Research Institute, Sudbury, ON, Canada.
Oscar GoJanssen Research and Development, Raritan, NJ, USA.
Jeroen GeurtsenBacterial Vaccines Discovery and Early Development, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.
Sanne van RooijJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Tuba VilkenLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Inage MinoruDepartment of Respiratory Medicine, Okitama Public General Hospital, 2000, Nishi-Otsuka, Kawanishi, Yamagata, Japan.
Izumi YasumoriDepartment of General Internal Medicine, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, Nagasaki, Japan.
Bart SpiessensJanssen Research and Development, Infectious Diseases and Vaccines, Janssen Pharmaceutica, Beerse, Belgium.
Evelina TacconelliDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Diagnostic and Public Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Lena M BiehlDepartment I of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital of Cologne, University of Cologne, 50924, Cologne, Germany.
Joshua T ThadenDepartment of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA.
Michal SarneckiJanssen Vaccines, Branch of Cilag GmbH International, Bern, Switzerland. sarnecki.michal@gmail.com.
Herman GoossensLaboratory of Medical Microbiology, Vaccine and Infectious Disease Institute, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Jan PoolmanBacterial Vaccines Discovery and Early Development, Janssen Vaccines & Prevention B.V., Leiden, The Netherlands.
Marc BontenJulius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Miquel EkkelenkampDepartment of Medical Microbiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
COMBACTE-NET Consortium/EXPECT Study Group

Funding

Characterization of a Novel E. coli Type III Secretion System Associated with Increased Patient MortalityK08AI171183 · NIAID · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Joshua T Thaden · 2022 to 2026
$895k
Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking 115523NIAID NIH HHS K08 AI171183
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClinical data characterizing invasive Escherichia coli disease (IED) are limited. We assessed the clinical presentation of IED and antimicrobial resistance (AMR) patterns of causative E. coli isolates in older adults.

methodsEXPECT-2 (NCT04117113) was a prospective, observational, multinational, hospital-based study conducted in patients with IED aged ≥ 60 years. IED was determined by the microbiological confirmation of E. coli from blood; or by the microbiological confirmation of E. coli from urine or an otherwise sterile body site in the presence of requisite criteria of systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA), or quick SOFA (qSOFA). The primary outcomes were the clinical presentation of IED and AMR rates of E. coli isolates to clinically relevant antibiotics. Complications and in-hospital mortality were assessed through 28 days following IED diagnosis.

resultsOf 240 enrolled patients, 80.4% had bacteremic and 19.6% had non-bacteremic IED. One-half of infections (50.4%) were community-acquired. The most common source of infection was the urinary tract (62.9%). Of 240 patients, 65.8% fulfilled ≥ 2 SIRS criteria, and 60.4% had a total SOFA score of ≥ 2. Investigator-diagnosed sepsis and septic shock were reported in 72.1% and 10.0% of patients, respectively. The most common complication was kidney dysfunction (12.9%). The overall in-hospital mortality was 4.6%. Of 299 E. coli isolates tested, the resistance rates were: 30.4% for trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 24.1% for ciprofloxacin, 22.1% for levofloxacin, 16.4% for ceftriaxone, 5.7% for cefepime, and 4.3% for ceftazidime.

conclusionsThe clinical profile of identified IED cases was characterized by high rates of sepsis. IED was associated with high rates of AMR to clinically relevant antibiotics. The identification of IED can be optimized by using a combination of clinical criteria (SIRS, SOFA, or qSOFA) and culture results.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMiddle AgedProspective StudiesAnti-Bacterial AgentsAntimicrobial resistanceBacteremiaBloodstream infectionElderlyExtraintestinal pathogenic E. coliInvasive E. coli diseaseSepsis

Identifiers

PMID38267801
PMCPMC11142950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.