Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267769›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2024

Prognostic value of preoperative geriatric nutritional risk index in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma after hepatectomy: a single‑center retrospective cohort study.

Daisuke Ogawa, Tatsunori Miyata, Shinsei Yumoto, Yuta Shiraishi, Takashi Matsumoto, Toru Takematsu, Masayo Tsukamoto, Shigeki Nakagawa, Kosuke Mima, Hidetoshi Nitta and 2 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daisuke OgawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan. hdobaba@kumamoto-u.ac.jp.
Tatsunori MiyataDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Shinsei YumotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Yuta ShiraishiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Takashi MatsumotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Toru TakematsuDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Masayo TsukamotoDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Shigeki NakagawaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kosuke MimaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Hidetoshi NittaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Hiromitsu HayashiDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Hideo BabaDepartment of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Life Sciences, Kumamoto University, 1-1 Honjo, Chuo-Ku, Kumamoto, 860-8556, Japan.
Kumamoto University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimPatients with malignant tumors are prone to develop nutritional disorders. The Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) is a new prognostic indicator for assessing the nutritional status. This study was performed to evaluate whether the preoperative GNRI can serve as a prognostic factor in patients with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) undergoing curative surgery.

methodsThis study included 123 consecutive patients with ICC who were treated with curative surgery. Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to calculate the recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS), and Cox regression analysis was used to evaluate prognostic factors.

resultsOf the 123 patients, 82 were male and 41 were female. The median age of the patients was 70 years, and the median follow-up period was 37.0 months (interquartile range, 16.2-71.7 months). The patients were classified by the median GNRI into a low GNRI group (GNRI < 105) and high GNRI group (GNRI ≥ 105). The patients in the low GNRI group had a significantly poorer prognosis in terms of RFS and OS than the patients in the high GNRI group (RFS, p = 0.0201; OS, p < 0.0001). Lymph node metastasis [hazard ratio (HR), 4.66; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.46-8.85], postoperative complications (HR, 2.38; 95% CI, 1.32-4.31), and a low GNRI (HR, 2.53; 95% CI, 1.42-4.50) were independent poor prognostic factors for OS.

conclusionThe GNRI may be a useful prognostic indicator in patients with ICC undergoing curative hepatectomy.

Indexed as

Bile Duct NeoplasmsCholangiocarcinomaAgedBile Ducts, IntrahepaticChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHepatectomyHumansInfantMalePrognosisRetrospective StudiesGeriatric Nutritional Risk IndexHepatectomyIntrahepatic cholangiocarcinomaOverall survivalRecurrence free survival

Identifiers

PMID38267769
OpenAlexW4391188047

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.