Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267748›Full record

ReviewInsights into imaging2024

Endometriosis MR mimickers: T1-hyperintense lesions.

Edouard Ruaux, Stéphanie Nougaret, Marie Gavrel, Mathilde Charlot, Mojgan Devouassoux-Shisheboran, François Golfier, Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, Pascal Rousset

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Insights into imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Edouard RuauxDepartment of Radiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, EMR 3738, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France.
Stéphanie NougaretDepartment of Radiology, Montpellier Cancer Institute, U1194, Montpellier University, 34295, Montpellier, France.
Marie GavrelDepartment of Radiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, EMR 3738, Pierre Bénite, France.
Mathilde CharlotDepartment of Radiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, EMR 3738, Pierre Bénite, France.
Mojgan Devouassoux-ShisheboranDepartment of Pathology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France.
François GolfierDepartment of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, EMR 3738, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France.
Isabelle Thomassin-NaggaraDepartment of Radiology, Service Imageries Radiologiques et Interventionnelles Spécialisées, Hôpital Tenon, Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Paris, Sorbonne Université, 75020, Paris, France.
Pascal RoussetDepartment of Radiology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon Sud University Hospital, Lyon 1 Claude Bernard University, 165 Chemin du Grand Revoyet, EMR 3738, 69495, Pierre Bénite, France. pascal.rousset@chu-lyon.fr.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6956-2800
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRSorbonne Université · FRUniversité de Montpellier · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endometriosis is a chronic and disabling gynecological disease that affects women of reproductive age. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is considered the cornerstone radiological technique for both the diagnosis and management of endometriosis. While MRI offers higher sensitivity compared to ultrasonography, it is prone to false-positive results, leading to decreased specificity. False-positive findings can arise from various T1-hyperintense conditions on fat-suppressed T1-weighted images, resembling endometriotic cystic lesions in different anatomical compartments. These conditions include hemorrhage, hyperproteic content, MRI artifacts, feces, or melanin. Such false positives can have significant implications for patient care, ranging from incorrect diagnoses to unnecessary medical or surgical interventions and subsequent follow-up. To address these challenges, this educational review aims to provide radiologists with comprehensive knowledge about MRI criteria, potential pitfalls, and differential diagnoses, ultimately reducing false-positive results related to T1-hyperintense abnormalities.Critical relevance statementMRI has a 10% false-positive rate, leading to misdiagnosis. T1-hyperintense lesions, observed in the three phenotypes of pelvic endometriosis, can also be seen in various other causes, mainly caused by hemorrhages, high protein concentrations, and artifacts.Key points• MRI in endometriosis has a 10% false-positive rate, leading to potential misdiagnosis.• Pelvic endometriosis lesions can exhibit T1-hyperintensity across their three phenotypes.• A definitive diagnosis of a T1-hyperintense endometriotic lesion is crucial for patient management.• Hemorrhages, high protein concentrations, lipids, and artifacts are the main sources of T1-hyperintense mimickers.

Indexed as

Deep infiltrative endometriosisEndometriosisFunctional hemorrhagic cystsMagnetic resonance imagingOvarian cysts

Identifiers

PMID38267748
PMCPMC10808095
OpenAlexW4391160786

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.