Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267737›Full record

ReviewThe AAPS journal2024

Using Mechanistic Modeling Approaches to Support Bioequivalence Assessments for Oral Products.

Fang Wu, Youssef Mousa, Rebeka Jereb, Hannah Batchelor, Sumon Chakraborty, Tycho Heimbach, Ethan Stier, Filippos Kesisoglou, Sivacharan Kollipara, Lei Zhang and 1 more

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in The AAPS journal, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Best Practices in Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic (PBPK) Modeling.CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Fang WuOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), White Oak, Building 75, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA. Fang.Wu@fda.hhs.gov.
Youssef MousaOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), White Oak, Building 75, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.
Rebeka JerebLek Pharmaceuticals d.d., a Sandoz Company, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Hannah BatchelorStrathclyde Institute of Pharmacy and Biomedical Sciences, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, Scotland.
Sumon ChakrabortyBiowaivers, Biocorrelation and Statistical Support, Global Research and Development, Apotex Inc, Toronto, Canada.
Tycho HeimbachMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
Ethan StierOffice of Clinical Pharmacology, Office of Translational Sciences, CDER, U.S. FDA, Silver Spring, Maryland, USA.
Filippos KesisoglouMerck & Co., Inc., Rahway, New Jersey, USA.
Sivacharan KolliparaBiopharmaceutics Group, Global Clinical Management, Dr. Reddy's Laboratories Ltd., Hyderabad, India.
Lei ZhangOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), White Oak, Building 75, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.
Liang ZhaoOffice of Research and Standards (ORS), Office of Generic Drugs (OGD), Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), White Oak, Building 75, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Silver Spring, Maryland, 20993, USA.

Funding

Center for Research on Complex GenericsU18FD007054 · FDA · UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE · PI JAMES E POLLI, Anna Schwendeman · 2020 to 2026
$6.8M
FDA HHS U18 FD007054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This report summarizes the proceedings for Day 1 Session 3 of the 2-day public workshop entitled "Best Practices for Utilizing Modeling Approaches to Support Generic Product Development," a jointly sponsored workshop by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Center for Research on Complex Generics (CRCG) in the year 2022. The aims of this workshop were to discuss how to modernize approaches for efficiently demonstrating bioequivalence (BE), to establish their role in modern paradigms of generic drug development, and to explore and develop best practices for the use of modeling and simulation approaches in regulatory submissions and approval. The theme of this session is mechanistic modeling approaches supporting BE assessments for oral drug products. As a summary, with more successful cases of PBPK absorption modeling being developed and shared, the general strategies/frameworks on using PBPK for oral products are being formed; this will help further evolvement of this area. In addition, the early communications between the industry and the agency through appropriate pathways (e.g., pre-abbreviated new drug applications (pre-ANDA) meetings) are encouraged, and this will speed up the successful development and utility of PBPK modeling for oral products.

Indexed as

Drug DevelopmentDrugs, GenericComputer SimulationTherapeutic EquivalencyUnited StatesUnited States Food and Drug AdministrationDrugs, Genericabsorptionmechanistic modelingoral productsvirtual bioequivalence

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.