Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267531›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A novel two-dimensional phantom for electrical impedance tomography using 3D printing.

Andrew Creegan, Poul M F Nielsen, Merryn H Tawhai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. [Research on a portable electrical impedance tomography system for evaluating blood compatibility of biomaterials].Sheng wu yi xue gong cheng xue za zhi = Journal of biomedical engineering = Shengwu yixue gongchengxue zazhi · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andrew CreeganAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand. acre018@aucklanduni.ac.nz.
Poul M F NielsenAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
Merryn H TawhaiAuckland Bioengineering Institute, The University of Auckland, Auckland, 1010, New Zealand.
University of Auckland · NZ

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is an imaging method that can be used to image electrical impedance contrasts within various tissues of the body. To support development of EIT measurement systems, a phantom is required that represents the electrical characteristics of the imaging domain. No existing type of EIT phantom combines good performance in all three characteristics of resistivity resolution, spatial resolution, and stability. Here, a novel EIT phantom concept is proposed that uses 3D printed conductive material. Resistivity is controlled using the 3D printing infill percentage parameter, allowing arbitrary resistivity contrasts within the domain to be manufactured automatically. The concept of controlling resistivity through infill percentage is validated, and the manufacturing accuracy is quantified. A method for making electrical connections to the 3D printed material is developed. Finally, a prototype phantom is printed, and a sample EIT analysis is performed. The resulting phantom, printed with an Ultimaker S3, has high reported spatial resolution of 6.9 µm, 6.9 µm, and 2.5 µm for X, Y, and Z axis directions, respectively (X and Y being the horizontal axes, and Z the vertical). The number of resistivity levels that are manufacturable by varying infill percentage is 15 (calculated by dividing the available range of resistivities by two times the standard deviation of the manufacturing accuracy). This phantom construction technique will allow assessment of the performance of EIT devices under realistic physiological scenarios.

Identifiers

PMID38267531
PMCPMC10808129
OpenAlexW4391166921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.