Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38267238›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Multicentre, open-label, randomised, controlled trial to compare early intervention with calcimimetics and conventional therapy in preventing coronary artery calcification in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (UPCOMING): a study protocol.

Daijo Inaguma, Yoshitaka Tatematsu, Naoki Okamoto, Soshiro Ogata, Hideki Kawai, Eiichi Watanabe, Yukio Yuzawa, Midori Hasegawa, Naotake Tsuboi

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 42% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Upacicalcet: A Novel Intravenous Calcimimetic Agent for Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis With Secondary Hyperparathyroidism.Therapeutic apheresis and dialysis : official peer-reviewed journal of the International Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Apheresis, the Japanese Society for Dialysis Therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Daijo InagumaNephrology, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan daijo@fujita-hu.ac.jp.ORCID 0000-0002-3977-5933
Yoshitaka TatematsuNephrology, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Naoki OkamotoNephrology, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Soshiro OgataPreventive Medicine & Epidemiology, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Suita, Osaka, Japan.
Hideki KawaiCardiology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Eiichi WatanabeCardiology, Fujita Health University Bantane Hospital, Nagoya, Japan.
Yukio YuzawaNephrology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Midori HasegawaNephrology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Naotake TsuboiNephrology, Fujita Health University, Toyoake, Japan.
Fujita Health University · JPFujita Health University Hospital · JPNational Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionCoronary artery and heart valve calcification is a risk factor for cardiovascular death in haemodialysis patients, so calcification prevention should be started as early as possible. Treatment with concomitant calcimimetics and low-dose vitamin D receptor activators (VDRAs) is available, but not enough evidence has been obtained on the efficacy of this regimen, particularly in patients with short dialysis duration. Therefore, this study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of early intervention with upacicalcet, a calcimimetic used to prevent coronary artery calcification in this patient population. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This multicentre, open-label, randomised, parallel-group controlled study will compare an early intervention group, which received upacicalcet and a low-dose VDRA, with a conventional therapy group, which received a VDRA. The primary endpoint is a change in log coronary artery calcium volume score from baseline to 52 weeks. The main inclusion criteria are as follows: (1) age 18 years or older; (2) dialysis is planned or dialysis duration is less than 60 months; (3) intact parathyroid hormone (PTH) >240 pg/mL or whole PTH level>140 pg/mL; (4) serum-corrected calcium≥8.4 mg/dL and (5) Agatston score >30. The main exclusion criteria are as follows: (1) history of parathyroid intervention or fracture in the past 12 weeks; (2) history of myocardial infarction, stroke or leg amputation in the past 12 weeks; (3) history of coronary angioplasty and (4) heart failure of New York Heart Association class III or worse. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study will comply with the Declaration of Helsinki and the Japanese Clinical Trials Act. The study protocol has been approved by the Fujita Health University Certified Review Board (file no. CR22-052). Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants. Study results will be presented in academic meetings and peer-reviewed academic journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: jRCTs041220126.

Indexed as

CalciumHyperparathyroidism, SecondaryPropionatesAdolescentCoronary VesselsHumansMulticenter Studies as TopicRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicRenal DialysisCalciumPropionatesupacicalcetCalcium & boneCoronary heart diseaseDialysis

Identifiers

PMID38267238
PMCPMC10823999
OpenAlexW4391225747

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.