ArticleJournal of anatomy2024
Sirenomelia: An anatomical assessment and genetic sex determination of two cases.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Sirenomelia: An anatomical assessment and genetic sex determination of two cases.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The etiology of sirenomelia is currently unknown. Data are limited in comparing external and internal abnormalities using modern imaging technologies and molecular genetic analysis. The purpose of the current study was designed to compare external and internal anatomical defects in two cases of sirenomelia and Potter's sequence. Considered rare, Potter's sequence is a fetal disorder with characteristic features of bilateral renal agenesis, obstructive uropathy, atypical facial appearance, and limb malformations. The internal and external malformations of two term fetuses with sirenomelia and Potter's sequence were compared using assessment of external features, radiography and MRI on internal structures, and molecular genetic studies on sex determination. Data reveal that both fetuses were male and manifested with an overlapping but distinct spectrum of abnormalities. Principal differences were noted in the development of the ears, brain, urogenital system, lower limbs, pelvis, and vertebral column. Defects of the axial mesoderm are likely to underlie the abnormalities seen in both fetuses. The first one, which had only caudal defects, was found to have a spectrum of abnormalities most similar to those associated with more severe forms of the small pelvic outlet syndrome, although the structure and orientation of the sacrum and iliae were different from previously reported cases. The other had both caudal and cranial defects, and was most similar to those described in the axial mesodermal dysplasia syndrome. Defects associated with sirenomelia can be evaluated with standard gross anatomy examination, radiology, MRI, and modified PCR techniques to determine anatomical abnormalities and the sex of preserved specimens, respectively. Evidence indicated that sirenomelia could be developed via various etiologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.