Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38266943›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of pharmaceutics2024

Development of in situ forming implants for controlled delivery of punicalagin.

Steven H Elder, Matthew K Ross, Ashleigh J Nicaise, Isaac N Miller, Austen N Breland, Ariory R S Hood

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of pharmaceutics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Steven H ElderDepartment of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville MS, United States. Electronic address: selder@abe.msstate.edu.
Matthew K RossDepartment of Comparative Biomedical Sciences, Mississippi State University, Starkville MS, United States.
Ashleigh J NicaiseCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Mississippi State University, Starkville MS, United States.
Isaac N MillerDepartment of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville MS, United States.
Austen N BrelandDepartment of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville MS, United States.
Ariory R S HoodDepartment of Agricultural & Biological Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville MS, United States.
Mississippi State University · US

Funding

Summer Research Experience for Veterinary StudentsT35OD010432 · OD · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI Barbara Lee-Faubert Kaplan, Temesgen Samuel · 2012 to 2026
$1.3M
EMCC-MSU Bridges to Baccalaureate Degree ProgramR25GM123920 · NIGMS · MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY · PI KOUBA, CARRIE, MEYER, FLORENCIA · 2018 to 2022
$1.1M
NIGMS NIH HHS R25 GM123920NIH HHS T35 OD010432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to efficient drainage of the joint, the development of intra-articular depots for long-lasting drug release is a difficult challenge. Moreover, a disease-modifying osteoarthritis drug (DMOAD) that can effectively manage osteoarthritis has yet to be identified. The current study was undertaken to explore the potential of injectable, in situ forming implants to create depots that support the sustained release of punicalagin, a promising DMOAD. In vitro experiments demonstrated punicalagin's ability to suppress production of interleukin-1β and prostaglandin E2, confirming its chondroprotective properties. Regarding the entrapment of punicalagin, it was demonstrated by LC-MS/MS to be stable within PLGA in situ forming implants for several weeks and capable of inhibiting collagenase upon release. In vitro punicalagin release kinetics were tunable through variation of solvent, PLGA lactide:glycolide ratio, and polymer concentration, and an optimized formulation supported release for approximately 90 days. The injection force of this formulation steadily increased with plunger advancement and higher rates of advancement were associated with greater forces. Although the optimal formulation was highly cytotoxic to primary chondrocytes if cells were exposed immediately or shortly after implant formation, upwards of 70 % survival was achieved when the implants were first allowed to undergo a 24-72 h period of phase inversion prior to cell exposure. This study demonstrates a PLGA-based in situ forming implant for the controlled release of punicalagin. With modification to address cytotoxicity, such an implant may be suitable as an intra-articular therapy for OA.

Indexed as

Hydrolyzable TanninsOsteoarthritisTandem Mass SpectrometryChromatography, LiquidDrug ImplantsHumansPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerDrug ImplantsHydrolyzable TanninsPolylactic Acid-Polyglycolic Acid CopolymerpunicalaginIn situ forming implantOsteoarthritisPoly(lactide-co-glycolide)Punicalagin

Identifiers

PMID38266943
PMCPMC10922986
OpenAlexW4391091892

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.