Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38266287›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene2025

Improving the Quality and Use of Malaria Surveillance Data: Results from Evaluating an Integrated Malaria Information Storage System at the Health Facility Level in Selected Districts in Mozambique.

Ann-Sophie Stratil, Neide Canana, Maria Rodrigues, Sarmento Armando, Sergio Gomane, Edson Zandamela, Kevin Baker, Arantxa Roca-Feltrer, Baltazar Candrinho

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Harnessing Malaria Surveillance Data for Transformative Malaria Control and Elimination.The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Ann-Sophie StratilMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Neide CananaMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Maria RodriguesMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sarmento ArmandoMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Sergio GomaneMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Edson ZandamelaMalaria Consortium, Maputo, Mozambique.
Kevin BakerMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Arantxa Roca-FeltrerMalaria Consortium, London, United Kingdom.
Baltazar CandrinhoNational Malaria Control Programme at Ministry of Health, Maputo, Mozambique.

Funding

Gates Foundation INV-009959
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mozambique addressed critical malaria surveillance system challenges by rolling out an integrated malaria information storage system (iMISS) at the district level in February 2021. The iMISS integrates malaria data from existing systems across thematic program areas to improve data availability and use. In seven districts, the platform was extended to health facilities (HFs), allowing HFs to access iMISS and use tablets to submit monthly malaria reports to a central database, eliminating the need for paper-based reporting to districts. A structured evaluation of the iMISS rollout to HFs was carried out in February-July 2021. The four evaluation areas were data quality (reporting rate, timeliness, and fidelity) of monthly malaria reports electronically submitted to the iMISS, adoption of the iMISS for data-informed decision-making, system maintenance, and acceptability of the iMISS among target users. All 94 HFs in the seven targeted districts were assessed. Over the 6-month period, 86.1% of reported cases on the iMISS were consistent with cases recorded in paper-based reports, allowing for up to 10% discrepancy. In addition, 69.0% of expected monthly district meetings were held, and information from iMISS was discussed during 58.6% of these meetings. Maintenance issues, mostly related to tablet access and internet connectivity, were experienced by 74.5% of HFs; 33.7% of issues were resolved within 1 month. The iMISS and electronic submission of malaria reports were well accepted by HF- and district-level users. Continued political commitment and timely execution of issue management workflows are crucial to ensure trust in the new platform and facilitate higher levels of data use.

Indexed as

Health FacilitiesMalariaData AccuracyEpidemiological MonitoringHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalMozambiquePopulation Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID38266287
PMCPMC11720678

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.