Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38266154›Full record

Trial reportBlood advances2024

A post hoc analysis of previously untreated patients with severe hemophilia A who developed inhibitors in the PUPs A-LONG trial.

Manuel Carcao, Michele Schiavulli, Roshni Kulkarni, Pablo Rendo, Meredith Foster, Elena Santagostino, Sandra Casiano, Christoph Königs

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase III
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood advances, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02234323 (An Open-Label, Multicenter Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII Fc Fusion Protein), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02234323 phase3completednot on this map

An Open-Label, Multicenter Evaluation of the Safety and Efficacy of Recombinant Coagulation Factor VIII Fc Fusion Protein (rFVIIIFc; BIIB031) in the Prevention and Treatment of Bleeding in Previously Untreated Patients With Severe Hemophilia A

TypeinterventionalSponsorBioverativ, a Sanofi companyRan2015 to 2019Enrolled108ConditionsHemophilia AArmsrFVIIIFc
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Manuel CarcaoHospital for Sick Children, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID 0000-0001-5350-1763
Michele SchiavulliSantobono-Pausilipon, Children's Hospital A.O.R.N., Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0384-7795
Roshni KulkarniMichigan State University, East Lansing, MI.ORCID 0000-0001-9372-3184
Pablo RendoSanofi, Waltham, MA.
Meredith FosterSanofi, Cambridge, MA.
Elena SantagostinoSobi, Basel, Switzerland.
Sandra CasianoSanofi, Cambridge, MA.
Christoph KönigsUniversity Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany.
Sanofi (United States) · USAVEO Oncology (United States) · USGoethe University Frankfurt · DEMichigan United · USSantobono Children's Hospital · ITUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractInhibitor development is a major therapeutic complication for people with hemophilia. The phase 3 PUPs A-LONG study evaluated the safety and efficacy of efmoroctocog alfa (a recombinant factor VIII Fc fusion protein, herein referred to as rFVIIIFc) in previously untreated patients (PUPs) with severe hemophilia A. Male PUPs <6 years old were enrolled and received rFVIIIFc; inhibitor development was the primary end point. Post hoc analyses, including patient treatment regimen patterns and timing of inhibitor development, descriptive and Kaplan-Meier analyses of time to first inhibitor-positive test by treatment regimen and by titer, and consumption, were performed to describe patients who developed inhibitors during PUPs A-LONG. We investigated patient characteristics (eg, demographics and genotype) and nongenetic risk factors (eg, intense factor exposure and central venous access device [CVAD] placement) that may predict inhibitor development and characteristics of inhibitor development (low-titer vs high-titer inhibitor). Baseline characteristics were similarly distributed for age, race, and ethnicity across both patients who were inhibitor-positive and those who were inhibitor-negative (all P > .05). High-risk F8 variants were associated with development of high-titer inhibitors (P = .028). High-titer inhibitor development was often preceded by the presence of a low-titer inhibitor. Patients whose low-titer inhibitor progressed to a high-titer inhibitor received a higher mean dose per infusion (98.4 IU/kg, n = 5) compared with those whose low-titer inhibitor resolved spontaneously (59.2 IU/kg, n = 7; P = .033) or persisted (45.0 IU/kg, n = 5; P = .047). There was no association between CVAD placement surgery and inhibitor development. Post hoc analyses suggest that F8 genotype and dose of factor are as important as inhibitor risk factors and require further investigation. This study was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov as #NCT02234323.

Indexed as

Hemophilia AChild, PreschoolEthnicityHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleRecombinant ProteinsRisk FactorsRecombinant Proteins

Identifiers

PMID38266154
PMCPMC10951906
OpenAlexW4391163407

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.