Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38266059›Full record

Trial reportClinical and translational science2024

Efficacy and safety of adamgammadex for reversing rocuronium-induced deep neuromuscular blockade: A multicenter, randomized, phase IIb study.

Yanhua Zhao, Sifan Chen, Wenqin Xie, Xiaoqing Zhang, Guozhong Chen, Fuhai Ji, Dongxin Wang, Youmao Qi, Qing Jie, Diansan Su and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter StudyClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and translational science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Yanhua ZhaoDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Sifan ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Wenqin XieDepartment of Anesthesiology, Quanzhou First Hospital Affiliated to Fujian Medical University, Quanzhou, China.
Xiaoqing ZhangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Tongji Hospital of Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Guozhong ChenDepartment of Anesthesiology, The 900 Hospital of the Chinese People's Liberation Army Joint Logistic Support Force, Fuzhou, China.
Fuhai JiDepartment of Anesthesiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
Dongxin WangDepartment of Anesthesiology, Peking University First Hosptial, Beijing, China.
Youmao QiHangzhou Adamerck Pharmlabs Inc, Hangzhou, China.
Qing JieHangzhou Adamerck Pharmlabs Inc, Hangzhou, China.
Diansan SuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Weifeng YuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Ren Ji Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Shanghai Jiao Tong University · CNNew England Biolabs (China) · CNFujian Medical University · CNPeking University First Hospital · CNPeople's Liberation Army 401 Hospital · CNSoochow University · CNTongji University · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China 81771133National Natural Science Foundation of China 81970995National Natural Science Foundation of China U21A20357Renji Hospital Clinical Innovation Foundation PYII20-09Renji Hospital Clinical Innovation Foundation RJPY-DZX-007Renji Hospital Clinical Innovation Foundation RJTJ-JX-002Shanghai Municipal Education Commission-Gaofeng Clinical Medicine Support 20191903Shanghai Municipal Science and Technology Commission Founding 21S31900100Shanghai Shenkang Founding SHDC22020208
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The rapid reversal of deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB) is important but remains challenging. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adamgammadex versus sugammadex in reversing deep rocuronium-induced NMB. This multicenter, randomized, phase IIb study included 80 patients aged 18-64 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade 1-2, undergoing elective surgery under general anesthesia with rocuronium. Patients were randomized to the adamgammadex 7, 8, and 9 mg/kg group or the sugammadex 4 mg/kg group. The primary efficacy variable was the time to recovery of train-of-four ratio (TOFr) to 0.9. The secondary efficacy variables were the time to recovery of TOFr to 0.7, antagonistic success rate of the recovery of TOFr to 0.9 within 5 min, and incidence rate of recurarization within 30 min after drug administration. The explorative efficacy variable was the time to recovery of the corrected TOFr to 0.9 (actual/baseline TOF ratio). Adamgammadex 7, 8, and 9 mg/kg and sugammadex 4 mg/kg groups did not significantly differ in all efficacy variables. Importantly, adamgammadex 9 mg/kg permitted reversal within a geometric mean of 2.9 min. According to the safety profile, adamgammadex achieved good tolerance and low incidence of drug-related adverse events compared with the 4 mg/kg sugammadex. Adamgammadex 7, 8, and 9 mg/kg facilitated rapid reversal of deep rocuronium-induced NMB and had good tolerance and low incidence of drug-related adverse events. Therefore, adamgammadex is a potential and promising alternative to sugammadex.

Indexed as

Neuromuscular BlockadeDrug ToleranceHumansImmune ToleranceRocuroniumSugammadexRocuroniumSugammadex

Identifiers

PMID38266059
PMCPMC10785706
OpenAlexW4390827085

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.