Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265920›Full record

ReviewCancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.)

Telemedicine and Cancer Care: Barriers and Strategies to Optimize Delivery.

Sahil D Doshi, Erin M Bange, Bobby Daly, Gilad Kuperman, Katherine S Panageas, Michael J Morris

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cancer journal (Sudbury, Mass.). The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Opportunities for Home Cancer Care: The Final Frontier.NEJM catalyst innovations in care delivery · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Development and evaluation of an intelligent individualized nutrition management (iNutrition) applet for postdischarge gastric cancer patients following gastrectomy.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sahil D DoshiFrom the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY.
Erin M Bange
Bobby Daly
Gilad Kuperman
Katherine S Panageas
Michael J Morris

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
Research & Methods CoreP50CA271357 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI MICHAEL J MORRIS · 2022 to 2026
$7.7M
Clinical Qualification of Imaging and Fluid-Based Tumor Monitoring Biomarkers for Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate CancerR01CA240759 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI MORRIS, MICHAEL J, SCHWARTZ, LAWRENCE H · 2020 to 2025
$4.3M
Oncology-focused Postdoctoral Training in Care Delivery and Symptom Science (OPTICS)T32CA275764 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INST CAN RESEARCH · PI JONINE L. BERNSTEIN, JUN J MAO · 2023 to 2026
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748NCI NIH HHS P50 CA271357NCI NIH HHS R01 CA240759NCI NIH HHS T32 CA275764
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractTelemedicine holds the potential to transform cancer care delivery and optimize value, access, and quality of care. A transformed regulatory environment coupled with the need to continue medical care despite operational limitations led to the rapid expansion of telemedicine in cancer care during the COVID-19 pandemic. Its utilization has since varied, and it has faced significant challenges. In this review, we will explore the state of telemedicine in cancer care delivery, the challenges it faces, and strategies to enhance its successful implementation.

Indexed as

COVID-19NeoplasmsTelemedicineHumansPandemics

Identifiers

PMID38265920
PMCPMC10832391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.