Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265696›Full record

ArticleThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2024

Soluble guanylate cyclase stimulators for heart failure: a network meta-analysis and subgroup analyses of reduced and preserved ejection fraction.

Mohamed T Abuelazm, Abdelrahman Attia, Mohamed Abdelnabi, Uzair Jafar, Omar Almaadawy, Mohamed A Elzeftawy, Abdelrahman Mahmoud, Khaled Albakri, Basel Abdelazeem

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Drug Therapy for Acute and Chronic Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction with Hypertension: A State-of-the-Art Review.American journal of cardiovascular drugs : drugs, devices, and other interventions · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.

Mohamed T AbuelazmFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt. Dr.mabuelazm@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-0689
Abdelrahman AttiaFaculty of Medicine, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt.
Mohamed AbdelnabiDepartment of Clinical Pharmacy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Uzair JafarDepartment of Medicine, King Edward Medical University, Lahore, Pakistan.
Omar AlmaadawyDepartment of Internal Medicine, MedStar Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Mohamed A ElzeftawyFaculty of Medicine, Tanta University, Tanta, Egypt.
Abdelrahman MahmoudFaculty of Medicine, Minia University, Minia, Egypt.
Khaled AlbakriFaculty of Medicine, Hashemite University, Zarqa, Jordan.
Basel AbdelazeemDepartment of Cardiology, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.
Tanta University · EGCairo University · EGHashemite University · JOKing Edward Medical University · PKMedStar Health · USMinia University · EGUniversity of Michigan · USWest Virginia University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSoluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) stimulators have been investigated for heart failure (HF) in several randomized controlled trials (RCTs). However, its place in the management guidelines of either HFrEF or HfpEF is still inconclusive.

methodsWe conducted a network meta-analysis synthesizing RCTs investigating sGC for HF management, which were retrieved by systematically searching five databases until January 24th, 2023. Dichotomous outcomes were pooled using risk ratio (RR) along with confidence interval (CI).

resultsEight RCTs with a total of 7307 patients were included. Vericiguat 10 mg significantly reduced the composite cardiovascular (CVS) mortality and HF hospitalization in HF (RR: 0.88, 95% CI [0.79; 0.98]) and in HFrEF (RR: 0.87, 95% CI [0.78; 0.97]); however, it was not effective in HFpEF (RR: 0.69, 95% CI [0.15; 3.05]). Also, vericiguat 10 mg showed no difference compared to placebo regarding the incidence of all-cause mortality (RR: 0.96, 95% CI [0.84; 1.10]), any adverse events (AEs) (RR: 0.94, 95% CI [0.83; 1.07]), any serious AEs (RR: 0.91, 95% CI [0.81; 1.01]), and any AEs leading to drug discontinuation (RR: 1.14, 95% CI [0.92; 1.40]).

conclusionVericiguat 10 mg was effective in reducing the composite CVS mortality and HF hospitalization, with an acceptable safety profile. This was only observed in HFrEF patients, but not in HFpEF patients. However, our data regarding other agents (riociguat and praliciguat) and HFpEF can be underpowered, warranting further RCTs to clarify vericiguat 10 mg place in HFrEF management guidelines and to investigate sGC stimulators for HFpEF in large-scale trials.

Indexed as

Heart failureMeta-analysisReviewRiociguatsGC stimulatorSoluble guanylate cyclase stimulatorsVericiguat

Identifiers

PMID38265696
PMCPMC10808080
OpenAlexW4391168540

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.