Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265668›Full record

SynthesisClinical oral investigations2024

Does malocclusion affect ingestion: a systematic review.

Nada El Osta, Pauline Chambon, Gaëlle Dol, Delphine Soulier-Peigue, Martine Hennequin

Abstract readSystematic Review
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Nada El OstaCentre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique (CROC), Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France. nada.el_osta@uca.fr.
Pauline ChambonCHU of Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Odontologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Gaëlle DolCentre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique (CROC), Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Delphine Soulier-PeigueCHU of Clermont-Ferrand, Service d'Odontologie, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Martine HennequinCentre de Recherche en Odontologie Clinique (CROC), Université Clermont Auvergne, F-63000, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
Université Clermont Auvergne · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Clermont-Ferrand · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe multifactorial aspect of malocclusions and their consequences on ingestion function is rarely described in the literature. The aims of this review are (i) to investigate the relationship between oral ingestion and malocclusion and (ii) to gather malocclusion tools that could help screen subjects at risk of malocclusion-related ingestion disorders. MATERIAL AND

methodsA systematic review was performed following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis Protocol (PRISMA-P 2015) guidelines. The analysis methods and inclusion criteria have been documented in a protocol published in the Prospective International Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) under the registration number CRD42023395840. The bibliographic search involved the PubMed®, Cochrane and PROSPERO databases.

resultsA total of 29 articles published between 2007 and 2023 were retained by the search criteria for the qualitative synthesis. Twenty of the studies found that the severity of malocclusion has a negative impact on oral ingestion. This review highlights that malocclusion and ingestion impairments are associated but it is not possible to determine causality due to the observational approach of many of the studies.

conclusionMalocclusion has a negative impact on ingestion function. During orthodontic consultations, particular interest should be directed towards chewing, biting, and swallowing disorders, which can affect patients' nutritional status. This review offers arguments for designing further studies assessing the extent to which malocclusions may affect nutritional status. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthodontic treatment should focus on improving patients' ingestion.

Indexed as

MalocclusionHumansMasticationMeta-Analysis as TopicProspective StudiesSystematic Reviews as TopicBitingEatingMalocclusion indicatorOrthodonticSuckingSwallowing

Identifiers

PMID38265668
OpenAlexW4391168746

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.