Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265633›Full record

ArticleDrugs - real world outcomes2024

Cabozantinib and Axitinib After Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Therapy in Patients with Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study from England.

Janet Brown, Brooke Harrow, Anne Marciniak, Christine McCarthy, Aude Houchard, Lori Cirneanu, Andrew Protheroe

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drugs - real world outcomes, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04637204 (Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04637204 completednot on this map

Treatment Patterns and Outcomes Among Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma (aRCC) Patients Treated With Cabozantinib or Axitinib Therapy: Non Interventional, Retrospective Study Using Data From Public Health England's Cancer Analysis System

TypeobservationalSponsorIpsenRan2020 to 2020Enrolled1,540ConditionsRenal Cell CarcinomaArmsCabozantinib, Axitinib
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Treatments for renal cell carcinoma: NICE Pilot Treatment Pathways Appraisal.Health technology assessment (Winchester, England) · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Janet BrownDivision of Clinical Medicine, University of Sheffield, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK. j.e.brown@sheffield.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4960-3032
Brooke HarrowFormerly Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Anne MarciniakFormerly Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Christine McCarthyFormerly Ipsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Aude HouchardIpsen, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
Lori CirneanuIQVIA, London, UK.
Andrew ProtheroeDepartment of Oncology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

objectiveThe tyrosine kinase inhibitors cabozantinib and axitinib have been widely used in England to treat advanced renal cell carcinoma following prior vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy, but data on real-world usage remain limited. Our objective was to describe the real-world treatment patterns and outcomes of patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma who received second-line or later-line (≥ 2L) cabozantinib or axitinib after vascular endothelial growth factor-targeted therapy in clinical practice in England.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study used clinical practice data (collected 2011-20) from the English Cancer Analysis System database. Patient characteristics, treatment sequence and duration, and overall survival (time from initiation of cabozantinib/axitinib treatment to death) were evaluated.

resultsData from 1485 eligible adults with advanced renal cell carcinoma were analyzed: 440 received ≥  2L cabozantinib (2L for 88.6% of them); 1045 received ≥  2L axitinib (2L for 89.5%). The most common first-line treatments were sunitinib (2L cabozantinib subcohort, 48%; 2L axitinib subcohort, 46%) and pazopanib (46% and 54%, respectively); nivolumab was the most common third-line treatment (18% and 19%, respectively). Median (interquartile range) 2L therapy duration was 5.52 (2.73-11.74) months for cabozantinib and 4.60 (1.45-12.36) months for axitinib. Following adjustment for potential confounders using inverse probability weighting, overall survival (median [interquartile range]) was longer for ≥ 2L cabozantinib (11.2 [5.7-28.0] months) than for ≥  2L axitinib (10.4 [4.7-22.0] months; log-rank p = 0.0034).

conclusionsThe Cancer Analysis System database is a valuable research resource providing extensive real-world clinical data. Real-world overall survival was longer with ≥  2L cabozantinib than with axitinib. CLINICAL

trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, NCT04637204; registered November 2020.

Identifiers

PMID38265633
PMCPMC11176148

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.