ArticleOdontology2024
Evaluation of the antimicrobial efficacy of different nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs alone or in combination with calcium hydroxide intracanal medicament: an in vitro study.
Article in Odontology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative antibacterial efficacy of calcium hydroxide, diclofenac sodium, chitosan, and boric acid against Enterococcus faecalis: an in vitro study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Antimicrobial Efficacy of Calcium Hydroxide Nanoparticles Combined with Nisin Against Enterococcus Faecalis in Root Canal Infections ��� an Ex Vivo Study.European endodontic journal · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study explored the antimicrobial effects of ketoprofen, piroxicam, and celecoxib alone or combined with calcium hydroxide (CH) against two strains of Enterococcus faecalis (E. faecalis) and assessed the influence of such combinations on the pH of CH. Minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of the three tested NSAIDs were determined. Tested pastes were placed into wells punched in seeded agar plates and the bacterial inhibition zones were measured. Antibiofilm activity was assessed against 3 weeks of biofilm induced in bovine dentine blocks. The pH of the pastes was measured at four-time intervals. MIC values were 3.12, 25, and 25 mg/ml for ketoprofen, piroxicam, and celecoxib, respectively, and were similar for both bacterial strains except for celecoxib, which showed 8% growth at the highest tested concentration against vancomycin-resistant E. faecalis. Ketoprofen had the largest mean inhibition zone that was comparable to CH. None of the six tested pastes exhibited antibiofilm activity of a significant level in comparison to CH. A noticeable increase in the antibiofilm activity was found when 20% NSAIDs were added to CH while maintaining an alkaline pH. Ketoprofen was found to be the most effective among the tested NSAIDs. Although its effect was comparable to CH, adding ketoprofen at a ratio of 20% resulted in 50% higher antimicrobial action than CH alone. Accordingly, incorporating NSAIDs in inter-appointment dressing has the potential to utilize their anti-inflammatory, local analgesic, and antibacterial actions, which overcome the limitations of CH and improve the outcome of root canal treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38265514What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.