Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265487›Full record

ArticleClinical oral investigations2024

Is there a difference in surgical accuracy following bimaxillary surgery between cleft and non-cleft patients?

Dirk-Melle Beek, Dirk-Jan Visser, Yi-Hsuan Chen, Frank Baan, Marloes Nienhuijs, Tong Xi

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical oral investigations, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dirk-Melle BeekDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands.
Dirk-Jan VisserDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands.
Yi-Hsuan ChenDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands.
Frank BaanRadboudumc 3D Lab, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands.
Marloes NienhuijsDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands.
Tong XiDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein 10, 6500, Nijmegen, HB, Netherlands. Tong.Xi@radboudumc.nl.
Radboud University Medical Center · NLChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo assess the surgical accuracy of 3D virtually planned orthognathic surgery among patients with and without cleft. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis retrospective cohort study included cleft and non-cleft patients with class III malocclusion who underwent bimaxillary surgery. CBCT scans were acquired before and immediately after surgery. 3D virtual surgical planning (VSP) was performed using CBCT and digitalized dentition data. All orthognathic surgeries were performed by the same surgeons using interocclusal splints. The primary outcome variable was surgical accuracy, defined as the difference between the planned and surgically achieved maxillary movements, quantified in six degrees of freedom. Analysis of covariance was used to test for intergroup differences in surgical accuracy after correcting for differences in the magnitude of planned surgical maxillary movements.

resultsTwenty-eight cleft and 33 non-cleft patients were enrolled, with mean ages of 18.5 and 25.4 years, respectively (P=0.01). No significant gender difference was present between the groups (P=0.10). After adjustment for small differences in surgical movements, no significant differences in surgical accuracy were observed between cleft and non-cleft patients.

conclusionThe present study demonstrates that high surgical accuracy in maxillary movements can be achieved in both cleft and non-cleft patients using VSP and interocclusal splints. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Orthognathic cases with cleft can be performed with 3D VSP to obtain a satisfactory surgical accuracy.

Indexed as

ExostosesMalocclusion, Angle Class IIIAdolescentAdultHumansMovementRetrospective StudiesSplintsYoung AdultCleftCongenital deformitiesDentofacial deformitiesOrthognathic surgical proceduresThree-dimensional

Identifiers

PMID38265487
PMCPMC10808377
OpenAlexW4391168804

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.