Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265481›Full record

ArticleMicrobial ecology2024

Dynamic Changes of Soil Microbial Communities During the Afforestation of Pinus Armandii in a Karst Region of Southwest China.

Bin He, Qing Li, Shun Zou, Xiaolong Bai, Wangjun Li, Yang Chen

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Microbial ecology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Bin HeCollege of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie City, 551700, Guizhou Province, China. hebin123kewen@163.com.
Qing LiCollege of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie City, 551700, Guizhou Province, China.
Shun ZouCollege of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie City, 551700, Guizhou Province, China.
Xiaolong BaiCollege of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie City, 551700, Guizhou Province, China.
Wangjun LiCollege of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie City, 551700, Guizhou Province, China.
Yang ChenCollege of Ecological Engineering, Guizhou University of Engineering Science, Bijie City, 551700, Guizhou Province, China.
Guizhou Institute of Plant Protection · CNGuizhou University · CN

Funding

Bijie Science and Technology Major Project Bkhzdzx [2021]1the Opening Fund for Guizhou Province Key Laboratory of Ecological Protection and Restoration of Typical Plateau Wetlands Bikelianhezi Guigongcheng [2021] 8the Project of Bijie Science and Technology Fund Bikelianhe [2023] 10 and 24the Project of Guizhou Science and Technology Fund Qiankehe Jichu-ZK [2021] 231the Support Plan for Young Science and Technology talents of Guizhou Province Education Department Qianjiaohe KY [2022]120 and 123the Technology Top Talent Project in Department of Education of Guizhou Province [2022]096
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Clarifying the response of soil microbial communities to vegetation restoration is essential to comprehend biogeochemical processes and ensure the long-term viability of forest development. To assess the variations in soil microbial communities throughout the growth of Pinus armandii plantations in the karst region, we utilized the "space instead of time" approach and selected four P. armandii stands with ages ranging from 10 to 47 years, along with a grassland control. The microbial community structure was determined by conducting Illumina sequencing of the 16 S rRNA gene and the ITS gene, respectively. The results demonstrated that afforestation with P. armandii significantly influenced soil microbial communities, as indicated by notable differences in bacterial and fungal composition and diversity between the plantations and the control. However, soil microbe diversity did not display significant variation across stand ages. Moreover, the bacterial community exhibited higher responsiveness to age gradients compared to the fungal community. Soil physicochemical factors play a critical role in elucidating microbial diversity and community composition variations during restoration processes. TN, AN, TP, AP, SOC, AK, and pH were the most significant influencing factors for the composition of bacterial community, while TC, SOC, pH, and TC

Indexed as

MicrobiotaMycobiomePinusChinaSoilSoilBacterial CommunityFungal CommunityKarst RegionPinus armandii. PlantationSoil PropertiesStand age

Identifiers

PMID38265481
PMCPMC10808146
OpenAlexW4391171739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.