Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265459›Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2024

Transient expression of heavy-chain neurofilaments in the perigeniculate nucleus of cats.

Natalia Merkulyeva, Aleksandr Mikhalkin

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Natalia MerkulyevaPavlov Institute of Physiology RAS, Makarov Nab., 6, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034. mer-natalia@yandex.ru.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1276-1918
Aleksandr MikhalkinPavlov Institute of Physiology RAS, Makarov Nab., 6, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 199034.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perigeniculate nucleus (PGN) is a visual part of the thalamic reticular nucleus modulating the information transfer between the lateral geniculate nucleus and the visual cortex. This study focused on the postnatal development of the PGN in cats, using the SMI-32 antibody, which recognizes non-phosphorylated heavy-chain neurofilaments responsible for neuronal structural maturation and is also used as a marker for motion processing, or Y, stream. We questioned whether transient neuronal populations exist in the PGN and can they possibly be related to the Y processing stream. We uncovered a transient, robust SMI-32 staining in the PGN of kittens aged 0-34 days with the significant decline in the cellular density of labeled cells in older animals. According to the double-labeling, in all examined age groups, perigeniculate SMI-32-immunopositive cells are part of the main parvalbumin-positive population. The maximal cellular density of the double-stained cells appeared in animals aged 10-28 days. We also revealed that the most significant growth of perigeniculate cells's soma occurred at three postnatal weeks. The possible link of our data to the development of the Y visual processing stream and to the heterogeneity of the perigeniculate neuronal population is also discussed.

Indexed as

Intermediate FilamentsNeuronsAnimalsCatsFemaleGeniculate BodiesThalamic NucleiVisual PerceptionCatParvalbuminPerigeniculate nucleusPostnatal developmentSMI-32

Identifiers

PMID38265459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.