ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024
Machine learning in the prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: a retrospective analysis as a proof-of-concept.
Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Systematic review and meta-analysis of machine learning models predicting massive hemorrhage protocol in trauma.Scientific reports · 2026Pooled it
- Early prediction of transfusion requirements in trauma patients using explainable machine learning.Transfusion · 2026Article
- Machine learning-based mortality prediction models for emergency department patients: a comparative analysis.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Advancements in smart healthcare in emergency trauma care: from intelligent triage to prognostic prediction.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- On-scene machine learning prediction model for massive transfusion in trauma and its association with in-hospital mortality.BJS open · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Patient Blood Management: A Systematic Review of Predictive, Diagnostic, and Decision Support Applications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- A comparison of clinical prediction scores for massive traumatic hemorrhage.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025Article
- Early mortality prediction after severe trauma using ensemble machine learning: a single-center retrospective study.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Enhancing Trauma Care: A Machine Learning Approach with XGBoost for Predicting Urgent Hemorrhage Interventions Using NTDB Data.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Mapping artificial intelligence models in emergency medicine: A scoping review on artificial intelligence performance in emergency care and education.Turkish journal of emergency medicineReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeEarly administration and protocolization of massive hemorrhage protocols (MHP) has been associated with decreases in mortality, multiorgan system failure, and number of blood products used. Various prediction tools have been developed for the initiation of MHP, but no single tool has demonstrated strong prediction with early clinical data. We sought to develop a massive transfusion prediction model using machine learning and early clinical data.
methodsUsing the National Trauma Data Bank from 2013 to 2018, we included severely injured trauma patients and extracted clinical features available from the pre-hospital and emergency department. We subsequently balanced our dataset and used the Boruta algorithm to determine feature selection. Massive transfusion was defined as five units at 4 h and ten units at 24 h. Six machine learning models were trained on the balanced dataset and tested on the original.
resultsA total of 326,758 patients met our inclusion with 18,871 (5.8%) requiring massive transfusion. Emergency department models demonstrated strong performance characteristics with mean areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.83. Extreme gradient boost modeling slightly outperformed and demonstrated adequate predictive performance with pre-hospital data only, as well as 4-h transfusion thresholds.
conclusionsWe demonstrate the use of machine learning in developing an accurate prediction model for massive transfusion in trauma patients using early clinical data. This research demonstrates the potential utility of artificial intelligence as a clinical decision support tool.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38265444What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.