Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265444›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society2024

Machine learning in the prediction of massive transfusion in trauma: a retrospective analysis as a proof-of-concept.

Anton Nikouline, Jinyue Feng, Frank Rudzicz, Avery Nathens, Brodie Nolan

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. A comparison of clinical prediction scores for massive traumatic hemorrhage.Scandinavian journal of trauma, resuscitation and emergency medicine · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anton NikoulineDepartment of Emergency Medicine, London Health Sciences Centre, 800 Commissioners Road E, London, ON, N6A 5W9, Canada. anton.nikouline@mail.utoronto.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8878-895X
Jinyue FengDepartment of Computer Science, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Frank RudziczVector Institute for Artificial Intelligence, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Avery NathensDepartment of Surgery, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Brodie NolanDivision of Emergency Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2872-0643

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEarly administration and protocolization of massive hemorrhage protocols (MHP) has been associated with decreases in mortality, multiorgan system failure, and number of blood products used. Various prediction tools have been developed for the initiation of MHP, but no single tool has demonstrated strong prediction with early clinical data. We sought to develop a massive transfusion prediction model using machine learning and early clinical data.

methodsUsing the National Trauma Data Bank from 2013 to 2018, we included severely injured trauma patients and extracted clinical features available from the pre-hospital and emergency department. We subsequently balanced our dataset and used the Boruta algorithm to determine feature selection. Massive transfusion was defined as five units at 4 h and ten units at 24 h. Six machine learning models were trained on the balanced dataset and tested on the original.

resultsA total of 326,758 patients met our inclusion with 18,871 (5.8%) requiring massive transfusion. Emergency department models demonstrated strong performance characteristics with mean areas under the receiver-operating characteristic curve of 0.83. Extreme gradient boost modeling slightly outperformed and demonstrated adequate predictive performance with pre-hospital data only, as well as 4-h transfusion thresholds.

conclusionsWe demonstrate the use of machine learning in developing an accurate prediction model for massive transfusion in trauma patients using early clinical data. This research demonstrates the potential utility of artificial intelligence as a clinical decision support tool.

Indexed as

Blood TransfusionMachine LearningWounds and InjuriesAdultAlgorithmsEmergency Service, HospitalFemaleHemorrhageHumansInjury Severity ScoreMaleMiddle AgedProof of Concept StudyRetrospective StudiesArtificial intelligenceBlood transfusionHemorrhageMachine learningTrauma centers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.