SynthesisCombinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening2025
Association of CirAEs and Efficacy in NSCLC Patients Treated with PD-1/PD-L1: A Meta-analysis of Cohort Studies.
Synthesis in Combinatorial chemistry & high throughput screening, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeTo systematically evaluate the relationship between cutaneous immunerelated adverse events (cirAEs) and the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to provide an evidence-based reference for the clinical application of PD-1/PD-L1 and safety evaluation.
methodsElectronic databases (PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) were screened systematically to collect prospective or retrospective cohort studies on the correlation between cirAEs and efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 in the treatment of NSCLC.
resultsA total of 3514 participants were included in 13 cohort studies (enclosing an ambidirectional cohort study). Outcomes revealed that compared with those patients with non cirAEs, patients suffering cirAEs were associated with significantly higher objective response rate (ORR) [risk ratio (RR): 1.74, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.42-2.14, P<0.00001], longer progressionfree survival (PFS) [RR: 0.52, 95% CI: 0.45-0.60, P<0.00001], and longer overall survival (OS) [RR:0.46, 95% CI: 0.38-0.56]. Sensitivity analyses through the exclusion of one study at a time did not significantly influence the outcomes, indicating that the meta-analysis results were relatively robust. Furthermore, subgroup analyses revealed consistent results in the study design (prospective or retrospective cohort studies), as well as in the endpoint results (PFS and OS) of Kaplan-Meier curves or Cox proportional hazards regression for evaluable patients.
conclusionCurrently, evidence reveals that cirAEs development may be associated with a good prognosis and can be an early predictor of the efficacy of PD-1/PD-L1 in the treatment of NSCLC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
38265378What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.