Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265302›Full record

ArticleHuman reproduction (Oxford, England)2024

Development of a single-visit protocol for the management of pregnancy of unknown location following in vitro fertilization: a retrospective study.

W M Dooley, L V de Braud, M Wong, S Platts, J A Ross, D Jurkovic

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human reproduction (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Clinical outcomes of patients with heterotopic pregnancy after laparoscopic surgery.European journal of obstetrics & gynecology and reproductive biology: X · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

W M DooleyFaculty of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0391-4989
L V de BraudFaculty of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-2563-2605
M WongFaculty of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-2168-1111
S PlattsEarly Pregnancy and Gynaecology Assessment Unit, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8723-6993
J A RossEarly Pregnancy and Gynaecology Assessment Unit, Kings College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4168-6910
D JurkovicFaculty of Population Health Sciences, Institute for Women's Health, University College Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-6487-5736
University College Hospital · GBKing's College Hospital · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

study questionCan women with pregnancy of unknown location (PUL) following in vitro fertilization (IVF) be risk-stratified regarding the subsequent need for medical intervention, based on their demographic characteristics and the results of serum biochemistry at the initial visit? SUMMARY ANSWER: The ratio of serum hCG to number of days from conception (hCG/C) or the initial serum hCG level at ≥5 weeks' gestation could be used to estimate the risk of women presenting with PUL following IVF and needing medical intervention during their follow-up. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: In women with uncertain conception dates presenting with PUL, a single serum hCG measurement cannot be used to predict the final pregnancy outcomes, thus, serial levels are mandatory to establish a correct diagnosis. Serum progesterone levels can help to risk-stratify women at their initial visit but are not accurate in those taking progesterone supplementation, such as women pregnant following IVF. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: This was a retrospective study carried out at two specialist early pregnancy assessment units between May 2008 and January 2021. A total of 224 women met the criteria for inclusion, but 14 women did not complete the follow-up and were excluded from the study. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,

methodsWe selected women who had an IVF pregnancy and presented with PUL at ≥5 weeks' gestation. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: A total of 30/210 (14.0%, 95% CI 9.9-19.8) women initially diagnosed with PUL required surgical intervention. The hCG/C was significantly higher in the group of women requiring an intervention compared to those who did not (P = 0.003), with an odds ratio of 3.65 (95% CI 1.49-8.89, P = 0.004). A hCG/C <4.0 was associated with a 1.9% risk of intervention, which accounted for 25.7% of the study population. A similar result was obtained by substituting hCG/C <4.0 with an initial hCG level <100 IU/l, which was associated with 2.0% risk of intervention, and accounted for 23.8% of the study population (P > 0.05). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: A limitation of our study is that it is retrospective in nature, and as such, we were reliant on existing data. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE

findingsA previous study in women with PUL after spontaneous conception found that a 2% intervention rate was considered low enough to eliminate the need for close follow-up and serial blood tests. Using the same 2% cut-off, a quarter of women with PUL after IVF could also avoid attending for further visits and investigations. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was required for this study. No conflicts of interest are required to be declared. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: N/A.

Indexed as

Fertilization in VitroProgesteroneFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy, High-RiskPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesProgesteroneectopic pregnancypregnancy complicationsspontaneous abortionthreatened abortiontubal pregnancy

Identifiers

PMID38265302
PMCPMC10905500
OpenAlexW4391174478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.