Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265301›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2024

Generative Large Language Models for Detection of Speech Recognition Errors in Radiology Reports.

Reuben A Schmidt, Jarrel C Y Seah, Ke Cao, Lincoln Lim, Wei Lim, Justin Yeung

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Reuben A SchmidtFrom the Department of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Footscray, Australia (R.A.S., L.L., W.L.); Alfred Health, Harrison.ai, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (J.C.Y.S.); Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (K.C., J.Y.); and Department of Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia (J.Y.).ORCID 0000-0002-0190-6352
Jarrel C Y SeahFrom the Department of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Footscray, Australia (R.A.S., L.L., W.L.); Alfred Health, Harrison.ai, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (J.C.Y.S.); Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (K.C., J.Y.); and Department of Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia (J.Y.).ORCID 0000-0002-2305-7873
Ke CaoFrom the Department of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Footscray, Australia (R.A.S., L.L., W.L.); Alfred Health, Harrison.ai, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (J.C.Y.S.); Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (K.C., J.Y.); and Department of Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia (J.Y.).
Lincoln LimFrom the Department of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Footscray, Australia (R.A.S., L.L., W.L.); Alfred Health, Harrison.ai, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (J.C.Y.S.); Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (K.C., J.Y.); and Department of Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia (J.Y.).ORCID 0000-0003-3390-5677
Wei LimFrom the Department of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Footscray, Australia (R.A.S., L.L., W.L.); Alfred Health, Harrison.ai, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (J.C.Y.S.); Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (K.C., J.Y.); and Department of Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia (J.Y.).
Justin YeungFrom the Department of Medical Imaging, Western Health, Footscray, Australia (R.A.S., L.L., W.L.); Alfred Health, Harrison.ai, Monash University, Clayton, Australia (J.C.Y.S.); Department of Surgery, Western Precinct, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia (K.C., J.Y.); and Department of Surgery, Western Health, Melbourne, Australia (J.Y.).

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study evaluated the ability of generative large language models (LLMs) to detect speech recognition errors in radiology reports. A dataset of 3233 CT and MRI reports was assessed by radiologists for speech recognition errors. Errors were categorized as clinically significant or not clinically significant. Performances of five generative LLMs-GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4, text-davinci-003, Llama-v2-70B-chat, and Bard-were compared in detecting these errors, using manual error detection as the reference standard. Prompt engineering was used to optimize model performance. GPT-4 demonstrated high accuracy in detecting clinically significant errors (precision, 76.9%; recall, 100%; F1 score, 86.9%) and not clinically significant errors (precision, 93.9%; recall, 94.7%; F1 score, 94.3%). Text-davinci-003 achieved F1 scores of 72% and 46.6% for clinically significant and not clinically significant errors, respectively. GPT-3.5-turbo obtained 59.1% and 32.2% F1 scores, while Llama-v2-70B-chat scored 72.8% and 47.7%. Bard showed the lowest accuracy, with F1 scores of 47.5% and 20.9%. GPT-4 effectively identified challenging errors of nonsense phrases and internally inconsistent statements. Longer reports, resident dictation, and overnight shifts were associated with higher error rates. In conclusion, advanced generative LLMs show potential for automatic detection of speech recognition errors in radiology reports.

Indexed as

Camelids, New WorldRadiologyRadiology Information SystemsSpeech PerceptionAnimalsReproducibility of ResultsSpeechSpeech Recognition SoftwareCTLarge Language ModelMachine LearningMRINatural Language ProcessingRadiology ReportsSpeechUnsupervised Learning

Identifiers

PMID38265301
PMCPMC10982816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.