ArticleThe British journal of radiology2024
Predicting axillary metastasis in breast cancer using lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration of one lymph node.
Article in The British journal of radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Stalk Sign in Bladder Cancer: CEUS Versus MRI.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesFine-needle aspiration (FNA) is a microinvasive method to diagnose lymph nodes. This study aims to determine the capability of lymphatic contrast-enhanced ultrasound (LCEUS)-guided FNA in predicting the axillary metastasis with the target of one lymph node (LN) in patients with breast cancer.
methodsLCEUS was prospectively performed in 105 patients with breast cancer. The most suspicious LN was targeted based on the characters of LCEUS. FNA was performed in the LN, followed by localization using a guide wire. The detection of lymph cells and/or tumour cells was recognized as a puncture success. Cytologic diagnosis was compared with histologic diagnosis of wire-marked LN for diagnosing accuracy and compared with histologic diagnosis of axillary LNs for predicting accuracy.
resultsLCEUS-guided FNA was performed in all 105 female patients who underwent axillary dissection. The puncture success rates were 74.3%, 91.4%, and 97.1% for three sequential groups (P = .010). In diagnosing LN metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of LCEUS-guided FNA were 89.7%, 100%, and 95.7%, respectively. In predicting axillary metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy values of LCEUS-guided FNA were 81.4%, 100%, and 91.3%, respectively.
conclusionsThe microinvasive LCEUS-guided FNA of one lymph node can be an accurate method and may help predict axillary metastasis in patients with breast cancer. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study presented that LCEUS combined with FNA would be practical in clinic. The characters of LCEUS could indicate the suspicious LNs and promote the accuracy in predicting axillary metastasis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.