Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38265283›Full record

ArticleeLife2024

Taste shaped the use of botanical drugs.

Marco Leonti, Joanna Baker, Peter Staub, Laura Casu, Julie Hawkins

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in eLife, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Marco LeontiDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria, Monserrato, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4726-9758
Joanna BakerSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4904-6934
Peter StaubDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria, Monserrato, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4875-7064
Laura CasuDepartment of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Cagliari, Cittadella Universitaria, Monserrato, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6480-8680
Julie HawkinsSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, United Kingdom.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9048-8016
University of Cagliari · ITUniversity of Reading · GB

Funding

Seventh Framework Programme 606895
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The perception of taste and flavour (a combination of taste, smell, and chemesthesis), here also referred to as chemosensation, enables animals to find high-value foods and avoid toxins. Humans have learned to use unpalatable and toxic substances as medicines, yet the importance of chemosensation in this process is poorly understood. Here, we generate tasting-panel data for botanical drugs and apply phylogenetic generalised linear mixed models to test whether intensity and complexity of chemosensory qualities as well as particular tastes and flavours can predict ancient Graeco-Roman drug use. We found chemosensation to be strongly predictive of therapeutic use: botanical drugs with high therapeutic versatility have simple yet intense tastes and flavours, and 21 of 22 chemosensory qualities predicted at least one therapeutic use. In addition to the common notion of bitter tasting medicines, we also found starchy, musky, sweet, and soapy drugs associated with versatility. In ancient Greece and Rome, illness was thought to arise from imbalance in bodily fluids or humours, yet our study suggests that uses of drugs were based on observed physiological effects that are often consistent with modern understanding of chemesthesis and taste receptor pharmacology.

Indexed as

Data AccuracyTasteAnimalsFecesFoodHumansPhylogenychemosensory perceptionethnobiologyethnopharmacologyevolutionary biologyherbal medicinehistory of medicinemedicinenonetaste of medicine

Identifiers

PMID38265283
PMCPMC10945733
OpenAlexW4386602922

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.