ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2024
Exact global alignment using A* with chaining seed heuristic and match pruning.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- Efficient sequence alignment against millions of prokaryotic genomes with LexicMap.Nature biotechnology · 2026Article
- Article
- Incorporating indel channels into average-case analysis of seed-chain-extend.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- Sassy: fuzzy searching DNA sequences using SIMD.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- QuickEd: high-performance exact sequence alignment based on bound-and-align.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- FORAlign: accelerating gap-affine DNA pairwise sequence alignment using FOR-blocks based on Four Russians approach with linear space complexity.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Block Aligner: an adaptive SIMD-accelerated aligner for sequences and position-specific scoring matrices.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2023Article
- Proving sequence aligners can guarantee accuracy in almostGenome research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationSequence alignment has been at the core of computational biology for half a century. Still, it is an open problem to design a practical algorithm for exact alignment of a pair of related sequences in linear-like time.
resultsWe solve exact global pairwise alignment with respect to edit distance by using the A* shortest path algorithm. In order to efficiently align long sequences with high divergence, we extend the recently proposed seed heuristic with match chaining, gap costs, and inexact matches. We additionally integrate the novel match pruning technique and diagonal transition to improve the A* search. We prove the correctness of our algorithm, implement it in the A*PA aligner, and justify our extensions intuitively and empirically. On random sequences of divergence d=4% and length n, the empirical runtime of A*PA scales near-linearly with length (best fit n1.06, n≤107 bp). A similar scaling remains up to d=12% (best fit n1.24, n≤107 bp). For n=107 bp and d=4%, A*PA reaches >500× speedup compared to the leading exact aligners Edlib and BiWFA. The performance of A*PA is highly influenced by long gaps. On long (n>500kb) ONT reads of a human sample it efficiently aligns sequences with d<10%, leading to 3× median speedup compared to Edlib and BiWFA. When the sequences come from different human samples, A*PA performs 1.7× faster than Edlib and BiWFA. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: github.com/RagnarGrootKoerkamp/astar-pairwise-aligner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.