ArticleJournal of anatomy2024
Comparative analysis of craniofacial shape in two mouse models of Down syndrome: Ts65Dn and TcMAC21.
Article in Journal of anatomy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Disrupted Neurogenesis from Basal Intermediate Precursor Cells Alters the Postnatal Neocortex in the TcMAC21 Mouse Model of Down Syndrome.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2025Article
- Comparative analysis of craniofacial shape in two mouse models of Down syndrome: Ts65Dn and TcMAC21.Journal of anatomy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Mouse models are central to studying and understanding the genotypic-to-phenotypic outcomes of Down syndrome (DS), a complex condition caused by an extra copy of the long arm of human chromosome 21. The recently developed TcMAC21-a transchromosomic mouse strain with comparable gene dosage to human chromosome 21 (Hsa21)-includes more Hsa21 genes than any other model of DS. Recent studies on TcMAC21 have provided valuable insight into the molecular, physiological, and neuroanatomical aspects of the model. However, relatively little is known about the craniofacial phenotype of TcMAC21 mice, particularly as it compares to the widely studied Ts65Dn model. Here we conducted a quantitative study of the cranial morphology of TcMAC21 and Ts65Dn mice and their respective unaffected littermates. Our comparative data comprise forty three-dimensional cranial measurements taken on micro-computed tomography scans of the heads of TcMAC21 and Ts65Dn mice. Our results show that TcMAC21 exhibit similar patterns of craniofacial change to Ts65Dn. However, the DS-specific morphology is more pronounced in Ts65Dn mice. Specifically, Ts65Dn present with more medio-lateral broadening and retraction of the snout compared to TcMAC21. Our findings reveal the complexity of potential gene interaction in the production of craniofacial phenotypes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.