Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264786›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2024

On the contrast response function of adapted neural populations.

Elaine Tring, Mario Dipoppa, Dario L Ringach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Visual adaptation stronger at the horizontal than the vertical meridian: Linking performance with V1 cortical surface area.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Elaine TringDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States.
Mario DipoppaDepartment of Neurobiology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4454-4224
Dario L RingachDepartment of Psychology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6439-334X

Funding

Thalamic constraints on cortical organizationR01EY034488 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2023 to 2025
$1.8M
Population codes and sensory discriminationRF1NS116471 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2020 to 2020
$1.2M
Population codes and sensory discriminationR01NS116471 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2023 to 2024
$789k
Cortical adaptation in neural populationsR21EY035064 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA LOS ANGELES · PI RINGACH, DARIO L · 2024 to 2025
$424k
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY034488NEI NIH HHS R21 EY035064NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS116471NINDS NIH HHS RF1 NS116471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The magnitude of neural responses in sensory cortex depends on the intensity of a stimulus and its probability of being observed within the environment. How these two variables combine to influence the overall response of cortical populations remains unknown. Here we show that, in primary visual cortex, the vector magnitude of the population response is described by a separable power law that factors the intensity of a stimulus and its probability. Moreover, the discriminability between two contrast levels in a cortical population is proportional to the logarithm of the contrast ratio.

Indexed as

NeuronsVisual CortexParietal LobeProbabilitycontrast responsemousepopulation codingpower lawprimary visual cortex

Identifiers

PMID38264786
PMCPMC11305633

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.