Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264722›Full record

ArticlePatterns (New York, N.Y.)2024

FHBF: Federated hybrid boosted forests with dropout rates for supervised learning tasks across highly imbalanced clinical datasets.

Vasileios C Pezoulas, Fanis Kalatzis, Themis P Exarchos, Andreas Goules, Athanasios G Tzioufas, Dimitrios I Fotiadis

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Patterns (New York, N.Y.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Vasileios C PezoulasUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Fanis KalatzisUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Themis P ExarchosUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.
Andreas GoulesDepartment of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), 15772 Athens, Greece.
Athanasios G TzioufasDepartment of Pathophysiology, Faculty of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), 15772 Athens, Greece.
Dimitrios I FotiadisUnit of Medical Technology and Intelligent Information Systems, Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Ioannina, 45110 Ioannina, Greece.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although several studies have deployed gradient boosting trees (GBT) as a robust classifier for federated learning tasks (federated GBT [FGBT]), even with dropout rates (federated gradient boosting trees with dropout rate [FDART]), none of them have investigated the overfitting effects of FGBT across heterogeneous and highly imbalanced datasets within federated environments nor the effect of dropouts in the loss function. In this work, we present the federated hybrid boosted forests (FHBF) algorithm, which incorporates a hybrid weight update approach to overcome ill-posed problems that arise from overfitting effects during the training across highly imbalanced datasets in the cloud. Eight case studies were conducted to stress the performance of FHBF against existing algorithms toward the development of robust AI models for lymphoma development across 18 European federated databases. Our results highlight the robustness of FHBF, yielding an average loss of 0.527 compared with FGBT (0.611) and FDART (0.584) with increased classification performance (0.938 sensitivity, 0.732 specificity).

Indexed as

class imbalancedropoutsfederated learninggradient boostinghybrid loss functionmachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38264722
PMCPMC10801222

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.