Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264701›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal. Digital health2024

Automatic triage of twelve-lead electrocardiograms using deep convolutional neural networks: a first implementation study.

Rutger R van de Leur, Meike T G M van Sleuwen, Peter-Paul M Zwetsloot, Pim van der Harst, Pieter A Doevendans, Rutger J Hassink, René van Es

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal. Digital health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. AI-Based QRS Onset Detection in the Early Ventricular Activation Site ECGs.IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Deep learning for electrocardiogram interpretation: Bench to bedside.European journal of clinical investigation · 2025
    Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rutger R van de LeurDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4779-5870
Meike T G M van SleuwenDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Peter-Paul M ZwetslootDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Pim van der HarstDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2713-686X
Pieter A DoevendansDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.
Rutger J HassinkDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0237-7867
René van EsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, Utrecht 3584 CX, The Netherlands.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9950-4388

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Expert knowledge to correctly interpret electrocardiograms (ECGs) is not always readily available. An artificial intelligence (AI)-based triage algorithm (DELTAnet), able to support physicians in ECG prioritization, could help reduce current logistic burden of overreading ECGs and improve time to treatment for acute and life-threatening disorders. However, the effect of clinical implementation of such AI algorithms is rarely investigated. Methods and results: Adult patients at non-cardiology departments who underwent ECG testing as a part of routine clinical care were included in this prospective cohort study. DELTAnet was used to classify 12-lead ECGs into one of the following triage classes: normal, abnormal not acute, subacute, and acute. Performance was compared with triage classes based on the final clinical diagnosis. Moreover, the associations between predicted classes and clinical outcomes were investigated. A total of 1061 patients and ECGs were included. Performance was good with a mean concordance statistic of 0.96 (95% confidence interval 0.95-0.97) when comparing DELTAnet with the clinical triage classes. Moreover, zero ECGs that required a change in policy or referral to the cardiologist were missed and there was a limited number of cases predicted as acute that did not require follow-up (2.6%). Conclusion: This study is the first to prospectively investigate the impact of clinical implementation of an ECG-based AI triage algorithm. It shows that DELTAnet is efficacious and safe to be used in clinical practice for triage of 12-lead ECGs in non-cardiology hospital departments.

Indexed as

Deep learningElectrocardiographyImplementationTriage

Identifiers

PMID38264701
PMCPMC10802816

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.