Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264637›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2023

Nathan T Jones, Laura Wagner, Molly C Pellitteri Hahn, Cameron O Scarlett, Cody J Wenthur

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Nathan T JonesSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Laura WagnerSchool of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Molly C Pellitteri HahnAnalytical Instrumentation Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Cameron O ScarlettAnalytical Instrumentation Center, School of Pharmacy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.
Cody J WenthurSchool of Pharmacy, Transdisciplinary Center for Research in Psychoactive Substances, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States.

Funding

Training Program In Molecular AND Cellular PharmacologyT32GM008688 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI AUDHYA, ANJON · 1998 to 2020
$6.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM008688
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The use of the psychedelic compound psilocybin in conjunction with psychotherapy has shown promising results in the treatment of psychiatric disorders, though the underlying mechanisms supporting these effects remain unclear. Psilocybin is a Schedule I substance that is dephosphorylated Methods: This study employed liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) to assess the time-course and plasma concentrations of psilocin following the intraperitoneal (IP) administration of psilacetin fumarate or psilocybin to male and female C57Bl6/J mice. Results: Direct comparisons of the time courses for psilocin exposure arising from psilocybin and psilacetin found that psilocybin led to 10-25% higher psilocin concentrations than psilacetin at 15-min post-injection. The half-life of psilocin remained approximately 30 min, irrespective of whether it came from psilocybin or psilacetin. Overall, the relative amount of psilocin exposure from psilacetin fumarate was found to be approximately 70% of that from psilocybin. Discussion: These findings provide the first direct support for the long-standing assumption in the field that psilacetin functions as a prodrug for psilocin

Indexed as

pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parametersprodrugpsilacetinpsilocinpsilocybin

Identifiers

PMID38264637
PMCPMC10804612

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.