Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38264520›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in medical oncology2024

A phase II study evaluating the efficacy of enzalutamide and the role of liquid biopsy for evaluation of ARv7 in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases including visceral disease (Excalibur study).

Pierangela Sepe, Giuseppe Procopio, Chiara Carlotta Pircher, Umberto Basso, Orazio Caffo, Vera Cappelletti, Melanie Claps, Ugo De Giorgi, Lucia Fratino, Valentina Guadalupi and 9 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03103724 (A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Enzalutamide and the Role of ARv7 in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03103724 phase2completednot on this map

A Phase II Study Evaluating the Efficacy of Enzalutamide and the Role of ARv7 in Metastatic Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) Patients With Visceral Disease.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MilanoRan2017 to 2021Enrolled68ConditionsCarcinoma ProstateArmsXtandi
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Pierangela SepeMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Via Giacomo Venezian 1, Milan 20133, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0645-7293
Giuseppe ProcopioMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Chiara Carlotta PircherMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Umberto BassoOncology Unit 1, Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Oncologico Veneto IOV IRCCS, Padova, Italy.
Orazio CaffoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Santa Chiara Hospital, Trento, Italy.
Vera CappellettiDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Melanie ClapsMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Ugo De GiorgiDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) Dino Amadori, Meldola, Italy.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7520-2908
Lucia FratinoDepartment of Medical Oncology, Centro di Riferimento Oncologico di Aviano, IRCCS, Aviano, Italy.
Valentina GuadalupiMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Patrizia MiodiniDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Cinzia De MarcoDepartment of Advanced Diagnostics, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Bruno PerrucciOncology Department, ASST Istituti Ospitalieri, Cremona, Italy.
Alessia MennittoDepartment of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Maggiore della Carità, Novara, Italy.
Daniele SantiniOncologia Medica, Campus Bio-Medico University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Francesco SpinaDepartment of Hematology and Oncology, Niguarda Cancer Center, Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda, Milan, Italy.
Marco StellatoMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Filippo de BraudMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.
Elena VerzoniMedical Oncology Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori di Milano, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Up to 30% of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) develop visceral metastases, which are associated with a poor prognosis. Objectives: Efficacy of enzalutamide in mCRPC patients with measurable metastases, including visceral and/or extra-regional lymph nodes. Methods: In this phase II multicenter study, patients with mCRPC and measurable metastases received enzalutamide as the first line. Primary endpoint: 3-month (mo) disease control rate (DCR) defined as the proportion of patients with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) as per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.1. Secondary endpoint: safety. Exploratory endpoint: the association between ARv7 splicing variants in basal circulating tumor cell (CTC)-enriched blood samples and treatment response/resistance using the AdnaTest ProstateCancerSelect kit and the AdnaTest ProstateCancer Panel AR-V7. Results: From March 2017 to January 2021, 68 patients were enrolled. One patient never started treatment. Median age: 72 years. A total of 52 patients (78%) received enzalutamide as a first line for mCRPC. The median follow-up was 32 months. At the 3-month assessment, 24 patients presented an SD, 1 patient achieved a CR, and 23 patients had a PR (3-mo-DCR of 72%). Discontinuations due to adverse events (AEs), disease-related death, or disease progression occurred in 9%, 6%, and 48% of patients. All patients reported at least one grade (G) 1-2 AE: the most common were fatigue (49%) and hypertension (33%). Six G3 AEs were reported: two hypertension, one seizure, one fatigue, one diarrhea, and one headache. Basal detection of ARv7 was significantly associated with poor treatment response (p = 0.034) and a nonsignificant association (p = 0.15) was observed between ARv7 detection and response assessments. At month 3, ARv7 was detected in 57%, 25%, and 15% of patients undergoing progressive disease, SD, and PR, respectively. Conclusion: The study met its primary endpoint, showing the efficacy of enzalutamide in men with mCRPC and measurable metastatic lesions in visceral and/or lymph node sites. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03103724. First Posted: 6 April 2017. First patient enrollment: 19 April 2017.

Indexed as

androgen receptor signaling inhibitorARv7CTCenzalutamideliquid biopsymetastatic castration-resistant prostate canceroverall survivalradiographic progression-free survivalvisceral

Identifiers

PMID38264520
PMCPMC10804904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.